Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35086523›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2022

Prognostic factors of patients with left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer: post hoc analysis of a retrospective multicenter study by the Japan Colonic Stent Safe Procedure Research Group.

Shungo Endo, Noriyuki Isohata, Koichiro Kojima, Yoshihiro Kadono, Kunihiko Amano, Hideo Otsuka, Tatsuya Fujimoto, Hideto Egashira, Yoshihisa Saida, Japan Colonic Stent Safe Procedure Research Group

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Long-term outcomes of standardized colonic stenting using WallFlex as a bridge to surgery: Multicenter prospective cohort study.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Shungo EndoDepartment of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizu-wakamatsu, Japan. endoswing@gmail.com.
Noriyuki IsohataDepartment of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizu-wakamatsu, Japan.
Koichiro KojimaDepartment of Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshihiro KadonoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kunihiko AmanoDepartment of Digestive Tract and General Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Hideo OtsukaDepartment of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya FujimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Hideto EgashiraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshihisa SaidaDepartment of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Japan Colonic Stent Safe Procedure Research Group
Shonan Kamakura General Hospital · JPToho University Ohashi Medical Center · JPTokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center · JPKin-ikyo Chuo Hospital · JPToho University · JPFukushima Medical University · JPKyorin University · JPSaiseikai Kumamoto Hospital · JPSaitama Medical University · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are many reports on the choice of treatment for and prognosis of left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer; however, few studies have focused on the prognostic factors of left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer. Therefore, we analyzed the prognostic factors using a post hoc analysis of a retrospective multicenter study in Japan.

methodsA total of 301 patients were enrolled in this study to investigate the prognostic factors for relapse-free survival. The relationships between sex, age, decompression for bridge to surgery, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, postoperative complications, adjuvant chemotherapy, carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and relapse-free survival were examined.

resultsNo change in the decompression method, T3 cancer, negative postoperative complications (grades 0-1 of Clavien-Dindo classification), and adjuvant chemotherapy during Stage III indicated a significantly better prognosis in a Cox univariate analysis. Lymph node metastasis was not selected as a prognostic factor. Excluding patients with <12 harvested lymph nodes (possible stage migration), lymph node metastasis was determined as a prognostic factor. In a Cox multivariate analysis, change in the decompression method, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis (excluding N0 cases with <12 harvested lymph nodes), and adjuvant chemotherapy were prognostic factors.

conclusionsSimilar to those in nonobstructive colorectal cancer, depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis were prognostic factors in left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer, and patients with <12 dissected lymph nodes experienced stage migration. Stage migration may result in disadvantages, such as not being able to receive adjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalHumansJapanLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStentsSurvival RateEmergency surgeryObstructive colorectal cancerPrognostic factorRelapse-free survivalSelf-expandable metallic stentStage migration

Identifiers

PMID35086523
PMCPMC8793252
OpenAlexW4210363108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.