Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35086227›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Utilization rate of corneal tissue obtained from donors over 75 years of age in Western India for keratoplasty.

Rakesh Shah, Supriya Hirwe, Jatin Ashar, Sabyasachi Sengupta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rakesh ShahSwaraashi Netralaya, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Supriya HirweMGRC Sahiyara Eyebank, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Jatin AsharMumbai Eyecare, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sabyasachi SenguptaFuture Vision Eyecare and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the utilization patterns of cornea procured from diseased individuals ≥75 years of age at an eye bank in western India.

methodsIn this retrospective study, data from 1,217 eyes of 653 donors with age ≥75 years were reviewed from October 2008 to December 2019. Donor age, lens status, endothelial cell count (ECD), utilization of the tissue for transplantation or non-clinical purposes (e.g., research, training/discarded), and causes of non-utilization were noted.

resultsThe mean age of the donors was 80.9 ± 4.6 years and the tissue utilization rate was 36.5% (445 out of 1,217 eyes). The eyes used for keratoplasty procedures had a lower donor age (79.6 ± 5.7 vs. 81.5 ± 5.1; P < 0.001), a higher endothelial cell count (2493 ± 531 vs. 2034 ± 581; P < 0.001), and were more often phakic (61% vs. 36.6%) compared to the unused group. A multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the likelihood of tissue utilization for keratoplasty was 13% higher with every 100-cell increment in donor ECD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.10-1.16, P < 0.001) and 33% lower with having a pseudophakic status in the donor eye (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52-0.87, P = 0.03). Age was not a significant determinant of tissue utilization when used in the same multivariable model.

conclusionMore than one-third of the eyes (36.5%) can be utilized even when the donors are above 75 years of age. Eyes that were more likely to be utilized for keratoplasty were phakic and had a significantly higher ECD; age was not a determinant in tissue utilization.

Indexed as

Corneal TransplantationDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountCorneaEndothelium, CornealEye BanksHumansRetrospective StudiesTissue DonorsCornea transplantdonor corneaeye bankinglens status-phakic/pseudophakic/aphakicold age

Identifiers

PMID35086227
PMCPMC9023935
OpenAlexW4210706099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.