Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35085878›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2022

Predicting falls within 3 months of emergency department discharge among community-dwelling older adults using self-report tools versus a brief functional assessment.

Pritika Dasgupta, Adam Frisch, James Huber, Ervin Sejdic, Brian Suffoletto

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pritika DasguptaEpidemiology Data Center, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Adam FrischDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
James HuberSchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, USA.
Ervin SejdicDepartment of Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada.
Brian SuffolettoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, USA. Electronic address: suffbp@stanford.edu.
West Virginia University · US

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
The internship in Biomedical Research, Informatics, and Computer Science (iBRIC): Biomedical Informatics and Data Science research experiences for students from Minority Serving InstitutionsT15LM007059 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HARRY S HOCHHEISER · 1987 to 2026
$23.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying older adults with risk for falls prior to discharge home from the Emergency Department (ED) could help direct fall prevention interventions, yet ED-based tools to assist risk stratification are under-developed. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of self-report and functional assessments to predict falls in the 3 months post-ED discharge for older adults.

methodsA prospective cohort of community-dwelling adults age 60 years and older were recruited from one urban ED (N = 134). Participants completed: a single item screen for mobility (SIS-M), the 12-item Stay Independent Questionnaire (SIQ-12), and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). Falls were defined through self-report of any fall at 1- and 3-months and medical record review for fall-related injury 3-months post-discharge. We developed a hybrid-convolutional recurrent neural network (HCRNN) model of gait and balance characteristics using truncal 3-axis accelerometry collected during the TUG. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrap resampling with 1000 iterations for SIS-M, FRQ, and GUG and leave-one-out for the HCRNN. We compared performance of M-SIS, FRQ, TUG time, and HCRNN by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic area under the curves (AUCs).

results14 (10.4%) of participants met our primary outcome of a fall or fall-related injury within 3-months. The SIS-M had an AUC of 0.42 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.65]. The SIQ-12 score had an AUC of 0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.80]. The TUG had an AUC of 0.48 (95% CI 0.29-0.68). The HCRNN model using generated accelerometer features collected during the TUG had an AUC of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98-1.00).

conclusionWe found that self-report and functional assessments lack sufficient accuracy to be used in isolation in the ED. A neural network model using accelerometer features could be a promising modality but research is needed to externally validate these findings.

Indexed as

Independent LivingPostural BalanceAftercareAgedEmergency Service, HospitalGeriatric AssessmentHumansMiddle AgedPatient DischargeProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSelf ReportTime and Motion StudiesFallsGaitOlder adultsPrognostication

Identifiers

PMID35085878
PMCPMC9231635
OpenAlexW4206321569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.