Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35085853›Full record

ArticleJournal of critical care2022

RAS inhibition and sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.

Alexander H Flannery, Adam S Kiser, Michael L Behal, Xilong Li, Javier A Neyra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [Severe post-COVID-19 dialysis dependence and inpatient acute kidney injury].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexander H FlanneryDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA; Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA. Electronic address: alex.flannery@uky.edu.
Adam S KiserDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY, USA.
Michael L BehalDepartment of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA.
Xilong LiUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Population and Data Sciences, Dallas, TX, USA.
Javier A NeyraDivision of Nephrology, Bone, and Mineral Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
Classical and Alternative Renin-Angiotensin System Dysregulation in Sepsis-Associated AKI: A Reverse Translation ApproachK23DK128562 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI FLANNERY, ALEXANDER H · 2022 to 2024
$415k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK128562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibiting medications prior to admission on the severity of kidney injury in patients presenting with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI). MATERIALS AND

methodsA single center, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adult patients admitted with diagnoses of both sepsis and AKI. RAS inhibition was defined as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. The primary outcome was Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage AKI upon hospital admission.

resultsOf 707 individuals studied, patients receiving RAS inhibition prior to admission (vs. those not) had more stage 3 AKI (40.1% vs. 28.7%; p = 0.008) and more frequently reached stage 3 AKI during the first week (49.8% vs. 41.1%; p = 0.047). In an adjusted multinomial regression model, patients receiving RAS inhibition (vs. those not) had an increased relative risk of presenting with stage 3 AKI on admission (vs. stage 1 AKI reference): RRR 2.32 (95% CI 1.50-3.59). Similar findings were observed in a propensity score matched analysis.

conclusionPatients receiving RAS inhibition (vs. those not) prior to an admission with SA-AKI presented with more severe AKI on admission and during the first week. Hospital mortality and kidney function at discharge were similar between groups.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjurySepsisAdultAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsFemaleHumansMaleRenin-Angiotensin SystemRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAcute kidney injuryAngiotensin converting enzyme inhibitorAngiotensin receptor blockerCritical careRenin-angiotensin systemSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID35085853
PMCPMC9727727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.