Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35085514›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2022

The effect of primary health care on tuberculosis in a nationwide cohort of 7·3 million Brazilian people: a quasi-experimental study.

Gabriela S Jesus, Julia M Pescarini, Andrea F Silva, Ana Torrens, Wellington M Carvalho, Elzo P P Junior, Maria Y Ichihara, Mauricio L Barreto, Poliana Rebouças, James Macinko and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Record linkage in tuberculosis epidemiological surveillance in Brazil: systematic methodological literature review.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Gabriela S JesusFaculty of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil; Centre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Julia M PescariniCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Andrea F SilvaInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Ana TorrensVital Strategies, Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Improvement and Data Impact Programs, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wellington M CarvalhoPan-American Health Organization, WHO Country Office for Brazil, Brasilia, Brazil.
Elzo P P JuniorCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Maria Y IchiharaCentre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Mauricio L BarretoInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil; Centre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Poliana RebouçasInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil; Centre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
James MacinkoDepartments of Health Policy and Management and Community Health Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Mauro SanchezDepartment of Public Health, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.
Davide RasellaInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil; Centre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, Instituto Gonçalo Moniz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil; ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic- Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: davide.rasella@isglobal.org.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRInstituto Vital Brazil (Brazil) · BRPan American Health Organization (Brasil) · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversal health coverage is one of the WHO End TB Strategy priority interventions and could be achieved-particularly in low-income and middle-income countries-through the expansion of primary health care. We evaluated the effects of one of the largest primary health-care programmes in the world, the Brazilian Family Health Strategy (FHS), on tuberculosis morbidity and mortality using a nationwide cohort of 7·3 million individuals over a 10-year study period.

methodsWe analysed individuals who entered the 100 Million Brazilians Cohort during the period Jan 1, 2004, to Dec 31, 2013, and compared residents in municipalities with no FHS coverage with residents in municipalities with full FHS coverage. We used a cohort design with multivariable Poisson regressions, adjusted for all relevant demographic and socioeconomic variables and weighted with inverse probability of treatment weighting, to estimate the effect of FHS on tuberculosis incidence, mortality, cure, and case fatality. We also performed a range of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

findingsFHS exposure was associated with lower tuberculosis incidence (rate ratio [RR] 0·78, 95% CI 0·72-0·84) and mortality (0·72, 0·55-0·94), and was positively associated with tuberculosis cure rates (1·04, 1·00-1·08). FHS was also associated with a decrease in tuberculosis case-fatality rates, although this was not statistically significant (RR 0·84, 95% CI 0·55-1·30). FHS associations were stronger among the poorest individuals for all the tuberculosis indicators.

interpretationCommunity-based primary health care could strongly reduce tuberculosis morbidity and mortality and decrease the unequal distribution of the tuberculosis burden in the most vulnerable populations. During the current marked rise in global poverty due to the COVID-19 pandemic, investments in primary health care could help protect against the expected increases in tuberculosis incidence worldwide and contribute to the attainment of the End TB Strategy goals.

fundingTB Modelling and Analysis Consortium (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), Wellcome Trust, and Brazilian Ministry of Health. TRANSLATION: For the Portuguese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge DistributionBrazilCohort StudiesCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMalePovertyPrimary Health CareTuberculosisUniversal Health InsuranceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35085514
PMCPMC8847211
OpenAlexW4206985662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.