Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35085364›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Resilience profiles across context: A latent profile analysis in a German, Greek, and Swiss sample of adolescents.

Clarissa Janousch, Frederick Anyan, Wassilis Kassis, Roxanna Morote, Odin Hjemdal, Petra Sidler, Ulrike Graf, Christian Rietz, Raia Chouvati, Christos Govaris

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Clarissa JanouschInstitute for Research and Development, School of Education, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg-Windisch, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4160-9758
Frederick AnyanDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Wassilis KassisInstitute for Research and Development, School of Education, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg-Windisch, Switzerland.
Roxanna MoroteDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Odin HjemdalDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Petra SidlerInstitute for Research and Development, School of Education, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Brugg-Windisch, Switzerland.
Ulrike GrafFaculty of Educational and Social Sciences, University of Education Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian RietzFaculty of Educational and Social Sciences, University of Education Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Raia ChouvatiDepartment of Primary Education, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece.
Christos GovarisDepartment of Primary Education, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated resilience profiles (based on levels of symptoms of anxiety and depression and five dimensions of protective factors) of 1,160 students from Germany (n = 346, 46.0% females, Mage = 12.77, SDage = 0.78), Greece (n = 439, 54.5% females, Mage = 12.68, SDage = 0.69), and Switzerland (n = 375, 44.5% females, Mage = 12.29, SDage = 0.88) using latent profile analyses. We also checked for measurement invariance and investigated the influence of gender and migration on class membership. A three-profile-solution was found for Switzerland (nonresilient 22.1%, moderately resilient 42.9%, untroubled 34.9%), and a four-profile-solution was the best fitting model for Germany (nonresilient 15.7%, moderately resilient 44.2%, untroubled 27.3%, resilient 12.7%) and Greece (nonresilient 21.0%, moderately resilient 30.8%, untroubled 24.9%, resilient 23.3%). Measurement invariance did not hold across the three countries. Profile differences regarding class membership predictions were detected for Germany and Greece, but none for Switzerland. Results implicate that resilience profiles are highly contextually sensitive, and resilience research findings should not be generalized considering the particularity of contexts, people, and outcomes.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionAdolescentChildEthnicityFemaleGermanyGreeceHumansMaleProtective FactorsSex FactorsStudentsSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID35085364
PMCPMC8794138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.