Trial reportPloS one2022
Validation of the patient health questionnaire-9 and the generalized anxiety disorder-7 in Lithuanian student sample.
Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) and 2-item (GAD-2) scales for detecting anxiety disorders in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- The bidirectional enigma of glaucoma and anxiety: from neuroinflammatory mechanisms to mind-body integrated therapies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Optimal cut-offs of depression screening tools during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of mindfulness stress reduction combined with cognitive behavioral therapy on perinatal anxiety disorder and maternal-infant bonding.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Mental health profiles and resilience among medical students in an active conflict zone: a cluster analysis.Medical education online · 2026Article
- One-Session Versus Three-Sessions of Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Public Speaking Anxiety: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Depression and anxiety symptom severity correlates with subjective fatigue characteristics in individuals with anxiety and mood disorders.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the Dominican Republic.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the patient health questionnaire-9 in helping professionals: factor structure, gender invariance, and construct validity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Perceived Stress and Anxiety in High School Senior Students: The Mediating Role of Social Support and the Moderating Influence of Lifestyle.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association between religiosity and anxiety and depression among university students: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety in Saudi adults with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effect of Mindfulness Training on the Clinical Pregnancy Rate in Women Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer: Study Protocol for a Single-Center, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Spectral EEG-guided adaptive neuromodulation for social anxiety disorder, performance-only subtype: a case report.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Sequential rTMS for MDD and OCD in a patient with left parietal perinatal ischemic infarct: a case report.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Psychoactive Substance Use and Its Association with Mental Health Symptomatology Among Latvian Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Development of a Recommendation Engine to University Student Mental Health Support Aligned With Stepped Care: Longitudinal Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Q-single: Linking functional impairment to problematic internet use through a single-question approach.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2025Article
- Burden of Common Mental Disorders in Ulcerative Colitis and Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients: An Analysis of Risk Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Depressive symptomatology in Brazil: perspectives of statistical and psychometrics analyses of the PHQ-9 at four time-points (2020-2023) in the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire- 7 (GAD-7) are short screening instruments used for detection of depression and anxiety symptoms in various settings, including general and mental health care as well as the general population. The aim of this study is to evaluate psychometric properties and factorial structure of the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 in a sample of Lithuanian university students.
methods1368 students (mean age 22.5±4.8) completed the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 questionnaires online; after the completion of the survey, students were asked to provide phone contact for an additional interview. Eligible students were approached later by trained interviewers and completed The Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised for assessment of depressive and anxiety disorders.
resultsResults showed that the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 are reliable screening tools for depression and anxiety (Cronbach alpha 0.86 and 0.91, respectively). The one-factor structure of the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 was confirmed by the Confirmatory Factor Analysis. A cut-off of ≥10 for the PHQ-9 resulted in 71% sensitivity and 66% specificity recognizing students with increased risk for mood or anxiety disorder. For the GAD-7, a cut-off ≥9 resulted in 73% sensitivity and 70% specificity recognizing students at risk. The PHQ-9 was sensitive but not specific in recognizing students with depressive disorders. The sensitivity and specificity of the GAD-7 in differentiating students with generalized anxiety disorders were low.
conclusionsThe PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 have sufficient formal psychometric properties, but their clinical utility as diagnostic tools for recognition of depressive and anxiety disorders in students is limited. Due to low specificity and high false positive rates, both scales are recommended only as an initial screening tool for recognition of subjects with increased risk of mental disorders, however positive cases should be later assessed using more comprehensive instruments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.