Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35085349›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Validation of the patient health questionnaire-9 and the generalized anxiety disorder-7 in Lithuanian student sample.

Aiste Pranckeviciene, Ausra Saudargiene, Julija Gecaite-Stonciene, Vilma Liaugaudaite, Inga Griskova-Bulanova, Dovile Simkute, Rima Naginiene, Laurynas Linas Dainauskas, Gintare Ceidaite, Julius Burkauskas

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aiste PranckevicieneLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Palanga - Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-8180-3504
Ausra SaudargieneLaboratory of Biophysics and Bioinformatics, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Julija Gecaite-StoncieneLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Palanga - Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vilma LiaugaudaiteLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Palanga - Kaunas, Lithuania.
Inga Griskova-BulanovaDepartment of Neurobiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biosciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Dovile SimkuteDepartment of Neurobiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biosciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Rima NaginieneLaboratory of Toxicology, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Laurynas Linas DainauskasLaboratory of Biophysics and Bioinformatics, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Gintare CeidaiteDepartment of Informatics, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Julius BurkauskasLaboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Palanga - Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-3928-2151
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTVilnius University · LTVytautas Magnus University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire- 7 (GAD-7) are short screening instruments used for detection of depression and anxiety symptoms in various settings, including general and mental health care as well as the general population. The aim of this study is to evaluate psychometric properties and factorial structure of the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 in a sample of Lithuanian university students.

methods1368 students (mean age 22.5±4.8) completed the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 questionnaires online; after the completion of the survey, students were asked to provide phone contact for an additional interview. Eligible students were approached later by trained interviewers and completed The Clinical Interview Schedule-Revised for assessment of depressive and anxiety disorders.

resultsResults showed that the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 are reliable screening tools for depression and anxiety (Cronbach alpha 0.86 and 0.91, respectively). The one-factor structure of the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 was confirmed by the Confirmatory Factor Analysis. A cut-off of ≥10 for the PHQ-9 resulted in 71% sensitivity and 66% specificity recognizing students with increased risk for mood or anxiety disorder. For the GAD-7, a cut-off ≥9 resulted in 73% sensitivity and 70% specificity recognizing students at risk. The PHQ-9 was sensitive but not specific in recognizing students with depressive disorders. The sensitivity and specificity of the GAD-7 in differentiating students with generalized anxiety disorders were low.

conclusionsThe PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 have sufficient formal psychometric properties, but their clinical utility as diagnostic tools for recognition of depressive and anxiety disorders in students is limited. Due to low specificity and high false positive rates, both scales are recommended only as an initial screening tool for recognition of subjects with increased risk of mental disorders, however positive cases should be later assessed using more comprehensive instruments.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersDepressionPatient Health QuestionnaireStudentsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLithuaniaMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID35085349
PMCPMC8794093
OpenAlexW4210261992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.