Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35085345›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Substrate-to-inoculum ratio drives solid-state anaerobic digestion of unamended grape marc and cheese whey.

Josue Kassongo, Esmaeil Shahsavari, Andrew S Ball

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josue KassongoARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia's Biosolids Resource, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3142-8048
Esmaeil ShahsavariARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia's Biosolids Resource, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Andrew S BallARC Training Centre for the Transformation of Australia's Biosolids Resource, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
RMIT University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inoculation dose is a key operational parameter for the solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) of lignocellulosic biomass, maximum methane recovery, and stable digester performance. The novelty of this study was the co-digestion of unamended full-strength grape marc and cheese whey for peak methane extraction at variable inoculation levels. An acclimatised digestate from a preceding anaerobic treatment was used as a downstream inoculum. The impact of inoculum size (wet weight) was evaluated at 0/10, 5/5, 7/3 and 9/1 substrate-to-inoculum (S/I) ratios, corresponding to an initial concentration of 20-30% total solids (TS) in digesters over 58 days at 45°C. The optimal 7/3 S/I produced the highest cumulative methane yield, 6.45 L CH4 kg-1 VS, coinciding with the lowest initial salinity at 11%; the highest volumetric methane productivity rate of 0.289±0.044 L CH4 LWork-1 d-1; the highest average COD/N ratio of 9.88; the highest final pH of 9.13, and a maximum 15.07% elemental carbon removal; for a lag time of 9.4 days. This study identified an optimal inoculation dose and opens up an avenue for the direct co-digestion of grape marc and cheese whey without requirements for substrate pretreatment, thus improving the overall bioenergy profile of the winery and dairy joint resource recovery operations.

Indexed as

BiofuelsBioreactorsCheeseVitisWheyAnaerobiosisBiofuels

Identifiers

PMID35085345
PMCPMC8794148
OpenAlexW4210707982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.