Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35085313›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Cholangiocarcinoma protective factors in Greater Mekong Subregion: Critical issues for joint planning to sustainably solve regional public health problems.

Nopparat Songserm, Somkiattiyos Woradet, Waratip Kankarn, Kanjanar Pintakham, Phouthong Vanhnivongkham, Nguyen Thi To Uyen, Nguyen Cong Cuu, Le Ngoc Cua, Banchob Sripa, Akhtar Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Complex Interventions for Cancer and Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Applications for Public Education.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Enhanced detection ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nopparat SongsermFaculty of Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3741-367X
Somkiattiyos WoradetFaculty of Health and Sports Science, Thaksin University, Phatthalung, Thailand.
Waratip KankarnFaculty of Nursing, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
Kanjanar PintakhamFaculty of Health Sciences, Chiang Rai Rajabhat University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Phouthong VanhnivongkhamChampasak Health Science College, Champasak, Lao PDR.
Nguyen Thi To UyenDong Thap Medical College, Dong Thap, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-4841
Nguyen Cong CuuDong Thap Medical College, Dong Thap, Vietnam.
Le Ngoc CuaFaculty of Allied Health Sciences, Mekong University, Vinh Long, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-5634-7669
Banchob SripaFaculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Akhtar AliDepartment of Biological Science, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although Opisthorchis viverrini (OV), lifestyle, and diet co-factors have a relatively high prevalence in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS) population, cumulative (0-74) incidence rates of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) do not reach 5% in this region. Other co-factors must influence, but in this study, we only highlighted positive factors for guiding joint planning to address public health problems at the regional level. Therefore, we aimed to study prevalence and factors associated with CCA incidence focusing only on protective factors. A cross-sectional analytic study was carried out from June to October 2017. Participants with informed consent completed the questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze general information. Primary variables were classified into high and low levels by mean. Logistic regression was employed to investigate the correlation between interesting variables and the overall risk level of CCA. The overall prevalence of CCA protective factors of the whole region was knowledge (61.39%), health beliefs (42.32%), prevention behavior (31.93%), and community participation (14.53%). When considering the proportions at a high level, they were 49.53%, 53.72%, 35.37%, and 49.67%, respectively. Significant factors associated with CCA prevention were females with secondary or vocational education, a high level of perceived seriousness and benefits, and community participation. These findings are likely to be helpful for both the public and administrators. First, it can be information for people to be aware of CCA risk. Second, policy-driven authorities at the local or regional level should apply the critical issues from this study for joint planning to sustainably solve regional public health problems.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsBile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCholangiocarcinomaCommunity ParticipationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedOpisthorchiasisOpisthorchisPrevalenceProtective Factors

Identifiers

PMID35085313
PMCPMC8794208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.