Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35085091›Full record

ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics

Expectile Neural Networks for Genetic Data Analysis of Complex Diseases.

Jinghang Lin, Xiaoran Tong, Chenxi Li, Qing Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinghang Lin
Xiaoran Tong
Chenxi Li
Qing Lu

Funding

Computational Efficient Statistical Tools for Analyzing Substance Dependence Sequencing DataR01DA043501 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LU, QING · 2017 to 2021
$2.1M
Methods and Software for High-dimensional Risk Prediction ResearchR01LM012848 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI LU, QING · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
Study of Addiction: Genetics and EnvironmentU01HG004422 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BIERUT, LAURA J. · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004422NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043501NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic etiologies of common diseases are highly complex and heterogeneous. Classic methods, such as linear regression, have successfully identified numerous variants associated with complex diseases. Nonetheless, for most diseases, the identified variants only account for a small proportion of heritability. Challenges remain to discover additional variants contributing to complex diseases. Expectile regression is a generalization of linear regression and provides complete information on the conditional distribution of a phenotype of interest. While expectile regression has many nice properties, it has rarely been used in genetic research. In this paper, we develop an expectile neural network (ENN) method for genetic data analyses of complex diseases. Similar to expectile regression, ENN provides a comprehensive view of relationships between genetic variants and disease phenotypes, which can be used to discover variants predisposing to sub-populations. We further integrate the idea of neural networks into ENN, making it capable of capturing non-linear and non-additive genetic effects (e.g., gene-gene interactions). Through simulations, we showed that the proposed method outperformed an existing expectile regression when there exist complex genotype-phenotype relationships. We also applied the proposed method to the data from the Study of Addiction: Genetics and Environment (SAGE), investigating the relationships of candidate genes with smoking quantity.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationNeural Networks, ComputerLinear ModelsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID35085091
PMCPMC10201460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.