Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35085029›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2022

Effect of respiratory rate and size of cannula on pressure and dead-space clearance during nasal high flow in patients with COPD and acute respiratory failure.

Maximilian I Pinkham, Ulrike Domanski, Karl-Josef Franke, Justus Hartmann, Maik Schroeder, Tony Williams, Georg Nilius, Stanislav Tatkov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Maximilian I PinkhamFisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand.
Ulrike DomanskiVamed Klink Hagen-Ambrock, Hagen, Germany.
Karl-Josef FrankeMärkische Kliniken GmbH, Lüdenscheid, Germany.
Justus HartmannMärkische Kliniken GmbH, Lüdenscheid, Germany.
Maik SchroederEvang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte GmbH, Essen, Germany.
Tony WilliamsMiddlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Georg NiliusEvang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte GmbH, Essen, Germany.
Stanislav TatkovFisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2064-0481
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (New Zealand) · NZWitten/Herdecke University · DEHelios Klinik Hagen Ambrock · DEKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEKlinikum Lüdenscheid · DEMiddlemore Hospital · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasal high flow (NHF) is an efficient oxygenation tool for the treatment of respiratory failure. The study investigated the effect of breathing pattern on positive airway pressure and dead-space clearance by NHF. The breathing cycle during NHF was characterized in 26 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and stable COPD and after mechanical ventilation (post-MV) via tracheostomy where also pressure was measured in the trachea. Dead-space clearance was measured in airway models during different breathing patterns. NHF reduced the respiratory rate (RR) and T

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory InsufficiencyCannulaHumansRespirationRespiratory Rateacute respiratory failuredead spacenasal high flowrespiratory ratework of breathing

Identifiers

PMID35085029
PMCPMC8836745
OpenAlexW4210509529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.