Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084987›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2022

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Dutch Randomized PREOPANC Trial.

Eva Versteijne, Jacob L van Dam, Mustafa Suker, Quisette P Janssen, Karin Groothuis, Janine M Akkermans-Vogelaar, Marc G Besselink, Bert A Bonsing, Jeroen Buijsen, Olivier R Busch and 23 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06310902 (Single-cell Sequencing Analysis of Resectable/Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 403 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
403citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06310902 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Single-cell Sequencing Analysis of Resectable/Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorFujian Medical University Union HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsPancreatic NeoplasmsArmsSingle-cell Sequencing Analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

403 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

343 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Eva VersteijneDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3861-5310
Jacob L van DamDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6947-9035
Mustafa SukerDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7935-4666
Quisette P JanssenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Karin GroothuisClinical Research Department, Comprehensive Cancer Organisation the Netherlands (IKNL) Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Janine M Akkermans-VogelaarClinical Research Department, Comprehensive Cancer Organisation the Netherlands (IKNL) Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6779-6646
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2650-9350
Bert A BonsingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4513-5737
Jeroen BuijsenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9521-8587
Olivier R BuschDepartment of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9605-6831
Geert-Jan M CreemersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9358-1996
Ronald M van DamDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8415-5090
Ferry A L M EskensDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sebastiaan FestenDepartment of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jan Willem B de GrootDepartment of Medical Oncology, Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1917-6973
Ignace H de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Marjolein Y V HomsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jeanin E van HooftDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4424-0079
Emile D KerverDepartment of Medical Oncology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Saskia A C LuelmoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9298-2878
Karen J NeelisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Joost NuyttensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Gabriel M R M PaardekooperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Gijs A PatijnDepartment of Surgery, Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Maurice J C van der SangenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1866-7367
Judith de Vos-GeelenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2578-1766
Johanna W WilminkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Aeilko H ZwindermanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cornelis J PuntDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Geertjan van TienhovenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Casper H J van EijckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Initial results of the PREOPANC trial failed to demonstrate a statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. The long-term results are reported.

methodsIn this multicenter, phase III trial, patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or upfront surgery in 16 Dutch centers. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisted of three cycles of gemcitabine combined with 36 Gy radiotherapy in 15 fractions during the second cycle. After restaging, patients underwent surgery followed by four cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine. Patients in the upfront surgery group underwent surgery followed by six cycles of adjuvant gemcitabine. The primary outcome was OS by intention-to-treat. No safety data were collected beyond the initial report of the trial.

resultsBetween April 24, 2013, and July 25, 2017, 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (n = 119) and upfront surgery (n = 127). At a median follow-up of 59 months, the OS was better in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group than in the upfront surgery group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.96;

conclusionNeoadjuvant gemcitabine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine improves OS compared with upfront surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyPancreatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyHumansSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID35084987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.