Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084731›Full record

Observational studyRevista de neurologia2022

Inpatient rehabilitation of working-age adults with ischemic stroke: comparing men and women clinical and functional characteristics at admission and predicting functionality.

A García-Rudolph, S Laxe, B Cegarra, J Saurí-Ruiz, E Opisso, J M Tormos, M Bernabeu

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista de neurologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A García-RudolphUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, España.
S LaxeHospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, España.
B CegarraInstitut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Guttmann-UAB, 08916 Badalona, España.
J Saurí-RuizInstitut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Guttmann-UAB, 08916 Badalona, España.
E OpissoInstitut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Guttmann-UAB, 08916 Badalona, España.
J M TormosInstitut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Guttmann-UAB, 08916 Badalona, España.
M BernabeuInstitut Universitari de Neurorehabilitació Guttmann-UAB, Badalona, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe role of gender in functional independence for activities of daily living after ischemic stroke is still controversial. We aim to a) compare clinical characteristics of men and women at inpatient rehabilitation admission b) compare their functional independence at admission and discharge c) identify predictors of functional independence. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective observational cohort study. State-of-the-art variables were used for admission and discharge comparisons and to predict total FIM (Functional Independence Measure) at discharge, FIM gain, FIM efficiency and FIM effectiveness using multivariate linear regressions.

results144 patients (33% women) admitted to inpatient rehabilitation in a Spanish specialized center, with less than 3 weeks since ischemic stroke onset were included. Men were older (p = 0.039), 19.6% of men had diabetes mellitus (6.4% of women) (p = 0.038), with 52.6% of men being non-smokers (72.3% of women) (p = 0.022). No significant differences were observed in FIM at admission, discharge, FIM gain, efficiency or effectiveness (total, motor either cognitive FIM). Regression analysis identified sex (ß = -0.13), stroke severity (ß = -0.25) and admission total FIM (ß = -0.69) as significant predictors of total FIM gain (R2 = 0.42). The same variables predicted discharge total FIM: sex (ß = -0.12), severity (ß = -0.23) and admission total FIM (ß = 0.59) (R2 = 0.51). FIM efficiency was predicted by admission total FIM (ß = -0.64), severity (ß = -0.24), age (ß = -0.17) and length of stay (ß = -0.45) (R2 = 39.9%). FIM effectiveness model explained only 13.5% of the variance.

conclusionsNo functional differences between men and women in any independence measure were found. Sex was a significant predictor but leaving half of the variance unexplained.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeStroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingAdultDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35084731
PMCPMC11500034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.