Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084719›Full record

Observational studyJournal of nephrology2022

Humoral immunogenicity and tolerability of heterologous ChAd/BNT compared with homologous BNT/BNT and ChAd/ChAd SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hemodialysis patients : A multicenter prospective observational study.

Michael Haase, Paul Lesny, Mark Anderson, Gavin Cloherty, Michael Stec, Anja Haase-Fielitz, Mathias Haarhaus, Carla Santos-Araújo, Pedro Mota Veiga, Fernando Macario

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Nefrologia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola Nefrologia · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michael HaaseDiaverum Renal Care Center, Potsdam, Germany. michael.haase@med.ovgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-7416
Paul LesnyDiaverum Renal Care Center, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3001-5257
Mark AndersonAbbott Infectious Disease Research, Chicago, IL, 60064-3500, USA.
Gavin ClohertyAbbott Infectious Disease Research, Chicago, IL, 60064-3500, USA.
Michael StecAbbott Infectious Disease Research, Chicago, IL, 60064-3500, USA.
Anja Haase-FielitzBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, 16816, Neuruppin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-2249
Mathias HaarhausDiaverum AB, Hyllie Boulevard 39, 215 37, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-6356
Carla Santos-AraújoInstitute of Integrated Health Care Systems Research & Social Medicine, Otto-Von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Pedro Mota VeigaSchool of Education, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Fernando MacarioDiaverum AB, Hyllie Boulevard 39, 215 37, Malmö, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter the reports of severe adverse reactions to the AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S-nCoV-19 vaccine, patients who had received one dose of ChAdOx1-S-nCoV-19 vaccine were recommended a second dose of Pfizer's BNT162b2 vaccine. In hemodialysis patients, we compared the humoral immunogenicity and tolerability of homologous vaccination with ChAdOx1-nCoV-19/ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 (ChAd/ChAd) and BNT162b2/BNT162b2 (BNT/BNT) with heterologous vaccination of first dose of ChAdOx1-nCoV-19 and a second dose with BNT162b2 (ChAd/BNT).

methodsIn a multicenter prospective observational study, SARS-CoV-2 spike-IgG antibody levels, Nucleocapsid-protein-IgG-antibodies, and vaccine tolerability were assessed 6 weeks after second SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in 137 hemodialysis patients and 24 immunocompetent medical personnel.

resultsIn COVID-19-naïve hemodialysis patients, significantly higher median SARS-CoV-2-spike IgG levels were found after ChAd/BNT (N = 16) compared to BNT/BNT (N = 100) or ChAd/ChAd (N = 10) (1744 [25th-75th percentile 276-2840] BAU/mL versus 361 [25th-75th percentile 120-936] BAU/mL; p = 0.009; 1744 [25th-75th percentile 276-2840] BAU/mL versus 100 [25th-75th percentile 41-346] BAU/mL; p = 0.017, respectively). Vaccinated, COVID-19-naïve medical personnel had median SARS-CoV-2 spike-IgG levels of 650 (25th-75th percentile 217-1402) BAU/mL and vaccinated hemodialysis patients with prior COVID-19 7047 (25th-75th percentile 685-10,794) BAU/mL (N = 11). In multivariable regression analysis, heterologous vaccination (ChAd/BNT) of COVID-19-naïve hemodialysis patients was independently associated with SARS-CoV-2 spike-IgG levels. The first dose of ChAd and the second dose of BNT after the first vaccination with ChAd (heterologous vaccination, ChAd/BNT) were associated with more frequent but manageable side effects compared with homologous BNT.

conclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, heterologous vaccination with ChAd/BNT appears to induce stronger humoral immunity and more frequent but manageable side effects than homologous vaccination with BNT/BNT or with ChAd/ChAd in COVID-19-naïve hemodialysis patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin GProspective StudiesRenal DialysisSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GViral VaccinesCOVID-19KidneymRNA-/vectored vaccinesSARS-CoV-2 spike IgGSide effects

Identifiers

PMID35084719
PMCPMC8792133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.