Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084702›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2022

Simulating the Genetics Clinic of the Future - whether undergoing whole-genome sequencing shapes professional attitudes.

Minna Brunfeldt, Harriet Teare, Daan Schuurbiers, Daniela Steinberger, Elianne Gerrits, Marleena Vornanen, Nine Knoers, Helena Kääriäinen, Terry Vrijenhoek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Minna BrunfeldtFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, Finland. minna.brunfeldt@thl.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4838-1378
Harriet TeareNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Daan SchuurbiersDe Proeffabriek, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Daniela SteinbergerInstitute of Human Genetics, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.
Elianne GerritsDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marleena VornanenUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Nine KnoersDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Helena KääriäinenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, Finland.
Terry VrijenhoekDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

horizon 2020 643439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can provide valuable health insight for research participants or patients. Opportunities to be sequenced are increasing as direct-to-consumer (DTC) testing becomes more prevalent, but it is still fairly unusual to have been sequenced. We offered WGS to fourteen professionals with pre-existing familiarity with an interest in human genetics - healthcare, science, policy and art. Participants received a hard drive containing their personal sequence data files (.BAM,.gvcf), without further explanation or obligation, to consider how experiencing WGS firsthand might influence their professional attitudes. We performed semi-structured pre- and post-sequencing interviews with each participant to identify key themes that they raised after being sequenced. To evaluate how their experience of the procedure evolved over time, we also conducted a questionnaire to gather their views 3 years after receiving their genomic data. Participants were generally satisfied with the experience (all 14 participants would choose to participate again). They mostly decided to participate out of curiosity (personal) and to learn from the experience (professional). Whereas most participants slightly developed their original perspective on genetic data, a small selection of them radically changed their views over the course of the project. We conclude that personal experience of sequencing provides an interesting alternative perspective for experts involved in leading, planning, implementing or researching genome sequencing services. Moreover, the personal experience may provide professionals with a better understanding of the challenges visitors of the Genetics Clinic of the Future may face.

Indexed as

Genetic testingGenomic dataHealthcareWhole-genome sequencing (WGS)

Identifiers

PMID35084702
PMCPMC8941039
OpenAlexW4210336617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.