Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084655›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2022

Regional Anesthesia Techniques for Pain Management for Laparoscopic Surgery: a Review of the Current Literature.

Alvaro Andrés Macías, John J Finneran

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05465525 nacompletednot on this map

Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block For Postoperative Analgesia In Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Double Blinded Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNamik Kemal UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled81ConditionsGynecologic DiseaseArmsQuadratus Lumborum Block Type III, Erector Spinae Plane Block, No Block
NCT05675657 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block For Postoperative Analgesia In Patient Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Randomized Double Blinded Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNamik Kemal UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled81ConditionsGynecologic DiseaseArmsNo Block, Quadratus Lumborum Block Type III, Erector Spinae Plane Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Identifying the best candidates for reduced port gastrectomy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alvaro Andrés MacíasMassachusetts Eye and Ear, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. amacias@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2276-9131
John J FinneranUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe field of regional anesthesia has evolved tremendously in the last 15 years. New anesthesia protocols for ambulatory surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery have been developed as well. The focus of these techniques and protocols has centered on patient satisfaction and pain control while minimizing the use of opioids. The field of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia continues to evolve, and regional anesthesia and its plane techniques are at the center of these changes. RECENT

findingsRecent research has shown that regional techniques contribute to better pain control and patient experience and may decrease patient readmission rates. The safety of these techniques has been validated when performed by experienced practitioners. New techniques such as the erector spinae block (ESP) have been studied in the setting of laparoscopic surgery with promising results. Regional anesthesia techniques for patients presenting for laparoscopic surgery are safe and seem to provide benefits. Those are related to patient experience, pain control, and readmission rates. Different techniques can be applied to a specific type of intervention. Application of these techniques depend on the clinical picture and patient. Future research may help us clarify how these techniques may improve patient satisfaction and operating room efficiency. New regional blocks may also develop based on what we know today.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, ConductionLaparoscopyNerve BlockHumansPain ManagementParaspinal MusclesPostoperative PainAmbulatoryAnesthesiaLaparoscopic surgeryRegional pain

Identifiers

PMID35084655
PMCPMC8792136
OpenAlexW4210264005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.