ArticleScience and engineering ethics2022
The Societal Readiness Thinking Tool: A Practical Resource for Maturing the Societal Readiness of Research Projects.
Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Responsible digital transformation in rural primary healthcare services: critical factors from a Norwegian case study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- A review of European-funded projects implementing living labs for the sustainability of agri-food systems.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Ethical Impact Assessment: Theoretical Foundations, Methodology, and Applications.Science and engineering ethics · 2025Article
- Societal Readiness Thinking Process 2.0: Incorporating Epistemic Reflexivity for Responsible Innovation.Science and engineering ethics · 2025Article
- Ethics Readiness of Technology: The Case for Aligning Ethical Approaches with Technological Maturity.Science and engineering ethics · 2025Article
- Open science readiness index: Theory and simulations.Fundamental research · 2025Article
- From complexity to commercial readiness: industry insights on bridging gaps in human-robot interaction and social robot navigation.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- Responsible research impact: Ethics for making a difference.Open research Europe · 2025Article
- Socrates in the Machine: The "House Ethicist" in AI for Healthcare.Journal of radiology nursing · 2023Article
- Everyday Experiences of People Living with Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce the Societal Readiness (SR) Thinking Tool to aid researchers and innovators in developing research projects with greater responsiveness to societal values, needs, and expectations. The need for societally-focused approaches to research and innovation-complementary to Technology Readiness (TR) frameworks-is presented. Insights from responsible research and innovation (RRI) concepts and practice, organized across critical stages of project-life cycles are discussed with reference to the development of the SR Thinking Tool. The tool is designed to complement not only shortfalls in TR approaches, but also improve upon other efforts to integrate RRI, sustainability, and design thinking in research and innovation cycles. Operationalization and early-stage user tests of the Tool are reported, along with discussion of potential future iterations and applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.