Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084542›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2022

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): closing the gap between image analysis and navigation in complex invasive diagnostic procedures.

S O'Sullivan, M Janssen, Andreas Holzinger, Nathalie Nevejans, O Eminaga, C P Meyer, Arkadiusz Miernik

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Reshaping Anesthesia with Artificial Intelligence: From Concept to Reality.Anesthesia and critical care (Houston, Tex.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

S O'SullivanDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Münster (UKM), Muenster, Germany. sosullivan810@gmail.com.
M JanssenDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Münster (UKM), Muenster, Germany.
Andreas HolzingerHuman-Centered AI Lab, Institute for Medical Informatics/Statistics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nathalie NevejansAI Responsible Chair, Research Center in Law, Ethics and Procedures, Faculty of Law of Douai, University of Artois, Arras, France.
O EminagaDepartment of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
C P MeyerUrology Clinic, Ruhr‑University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Arkadiusz MiernikDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg-Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DEFederal Ministry of Education and Research · DEMedical University of Graz · ATRuhr University Bochum · DEStanford University · USUniversité d'Artois · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

literature reviewCystoscopy is the gold standard for initial macroscopic assessments of the human urinary bladder to rule out (or diagnose) bladder cancer (BCa). Despite having guidelines, cystoscopic findings are diverse and often challenging to classify. The extent of the false negatives and false positives in cystoscopic diagnosis is currently unknown. We suspect that there is a certain degree of under-diagnosis (like the failure to detect malignant tumours) and over-diagnosis (e.g. sending the patient for unnecessary transurethral resection of bladder tumors with anesthesia) that put the patient at risk.

conclusionsXAI robot-assisted cystoscopes would help to overcome the risks/flaws of conventional cystoscopy. Cystoscopy is considered a less life-threatening starting point for automation than open surgical procedures. Semi-autonomous cystoscopy requires standards and cystoscopy is a good procedure to establish a model that can then be exported/copied to other procedures of endoscopy and surgery. Standards also define the automation levels-an issue for medical product law. These cystoscopy skills do not give full autonomy to the machine, and represent a surgical parallel to 'Autonomous Driving' (where a standard requires a human supervisor to remain in the 'vehicle'). Here in robotic cystoscopy, a human supervisor remains bedside in the 'operating room' as a 'human-in-the-loop' in order to safeguard patients. The urologists will be able to delegate personal- and time-consuming cystoscopy to a specialised nurse. The result of automated diagnostic cystoscopy is a short video (with pre-processed photos from the video), which are then reviewed by the urologists at a more convenient time.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCystoscopyFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleUrinary BladderAutonomous endoscopyAutonomous surgeryBladder cancer detectionBladder cancer diagnosisCystoscopyRobotic endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID35084542
PMCPMC8791809
OpenAlexW4210430111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.