ArticleUrolithiasis2022
Renal puncture access via a nonpapillary track in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an in vitro porcine kidney experience.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing the outcomes of papillary and non-papillary access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.World journal of urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, an increasing number of investigators have debated the wide rule of the puncture to renal papilla in PCNL. We evaluated the effect of renal papillary and nonpapillary puncture on bleeding in an in vitro porcine kidney experience, with the aim of determining the safe puncture sites of collecting system in PCNL. A total of 70 fresh porcine kidneys were selected and subjected to nephrostomy. We performed a puncture through a renal papilla, infundibulum, renal column, or minor calyceal neck (including the front, back, up, and down). The primary outcome was the amount of bleeding. The results showed that the papillary puncture group yielded minimal bleeding (1.59 ± 1.01 ml/min) compared with the infundibular puncture group (6.25 ± 4.46 ml/min, P < .001), renal column puncture group (4.24 ± 3.79 ml/min, P = 0.001), and minor calyceal neck puncture group (2.27 ± 1.35 ml/min, P = 0.011). However, after stratifying by orientation, the up (1.75 ± 0.80 ml/min, P = 0.501) or down (1.77 ± 0.72 ml/min, P = 0.437) minor calyceal neck puncture group and papillary puncture group yielded comparable bleeding. In summary, nonpapillary puncture must be carefully considered. Infundibular and renal column punctures were inferior to papillary puncture, and up or down minor calyceal neck puncture may be a prudent choice in specific situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.