ArticleEuropean radiology2022
Proximal nerve MR neurography with diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating subtypes of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nerve Diameter and DTI Parameters Maybe Potential Markers for Clinical Trial in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of proximal nerve MR neurography with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for differentiating Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) 1A, CMT2, and healthy controls.
methodsThe diameters, fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) of L4-L5 nerve roots, femoral nerve (FN), and sciatic nerve (SN) were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance. DeLong's tests were applied to compare multiple ROC curves. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for interobserver agreement assessment.
resultsThe diameters of the L4 nerve root, L5 nerve root, and SN of CMT1A patients were significantly larger than those of CMT2 patients and healthy controls. The FA values of all measured proximal nerves were significantly higher in controls (0.46 ± 0.09, 0.46 ± 0.08, 0.45 ± 0.07, and 0.48 ± 0.08) than in CMT1A patients (0.30 ± 0.09, 0.29 ± 0.06, 0.35 ± 0.08, and 0.29 ± 0.09). The FA values of the L5 nerve root, FN, and SN were significantly higher in controls (0.46 ± 0.08, 0.45 ± 0.07, and 0.48 ± 0.08) than in CMT2 patients (0.36 ± 0.06, 0.34 ± 0.07, and 0.34 ± 0.10). The MD and RD values of the L5 nerve root in CMT1A patients (1.59 ± 0.21 and 1.37 ± 0.21) were higher than those in CMT2 patients (1.31 ± 0.17 and 1.05 ± 0.14). The AUCs of the above parameters ranged from 0.780 to 1.000. For the measurements of nerve diameters, the ICC ranged from 0.91 to 0.97. For the measurements of DTI metrics, the ICC ranged from 0.87 to 0.97.
conclusionsMR neurography with DTI is able to differentiate CMT1A patients, CMT2 patients, and healthy controls. KEY POINTS: • MR neurography with diffusion tensor imaging of the L4-5 nerve roots, proximal femoral nerve, and proximal sciatic nerve is able to discriminate CMT1A, CMT2, and healthy controls. • This method provides an alternative for the diagnosis and discrimination of CMT1A and CMT2, which is crucial for clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.