Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084510›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2022

[Update of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines 2021-What is new?]

Josef Briegel, Patrick Möhnle

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Josef BriegelKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. josef.briegel@med.lmu.de.
Patrick MöhnleAbteilung für Transfusionsmedizin, Zelltherapeutika and Hämostaseologie, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), München, Deutschland.
LMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The revised and redefined "International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021" of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign were published on 4 October 2021. As in the previous version from 2016, the focus of these international guidelines is on the diagnosis and acute treatment measures in sepsis. The topics long-term outcome and treatment targets for rehabilitation are extensively discussed and accompanied by specific recommendations. These recommendations and the underlying studies reflect the increasing awareness about the long-term consequences of severe diseases requiring intensive medical care. This article summarizes the updates in a clearly comprehensible form.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticCritical CareHumansAnti-infective agentsHemodynamicsLong-term outcomeScreeningTime-to-treatment

Identifiers

PMID35084510
OpenAlexW4210306508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.