Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084499›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2022

The Role of DNA Methylation in Genome Defense in Cnidaria and Other Invertebrates.

Hua Ying, David C Hayward, Alexander Klimovich, Thomas C G Bosch, Laura Baldassarre, Teresa Neeman, Sylvain Forêt, Gavin Huttley, Adam M Reitzel, Sebastian Fraune and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integration of epigenetics into ecotoxicology: insights and fundamental research needs.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  6. DNA methylation in invertebrate genomes and cell lineage plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Complementary genetic and epigenetic changes facilitate rapid adaptation to multiple global change stressors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Hua YingResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
David C HaywardResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Alexander KlimovichZoological Institute, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany.
Thomas C G BoschZoological Institute, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany.
Laura BaldassarreDepartment of Zoology and Organismal Interactions, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Teresa NeemanBiological Data Institute, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Sylvain ForêtResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Gavin HuttleyResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Adam M ReitzelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Sebastian FrauneDepartment of Zoology and Organismal Interactions, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Eldon E BallResearch School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
David J MillerARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0291-9531
Australian National University · AUChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JPUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable attention has recently been focused on the potential involvement of DNA methylation in regulating gene expression in cnidarians. Much of this work has been centered on corals, in the context of changes in methylation perhaps facilitating adaptation to higher seawater temperatures and other stressful conditions. Although first proposed more than 30 years ago, the possibility that DNA methylation systems function in protecting animal genomes against the harmful effects of transposon activity has largely been ignored since that time. Here, we show that transposons are specifically targeted by the DNA methylation system in cnidarians, and that the youngest transposons (i.e., those most likely to be active) are most highly methylated. Transposons in longer and highly active genes were preferentially methylated and, as transposons aged, methylation levels declined, reducing the potentially harmful side effects of CpG methylation. In Cnidaria and a range of other invertebrates, correlation between the overall extent of methylation and transposon content was strongly supported. Present transposon burden is the dominant factor in determining overall level of genomic methylation in a range of animals that diverged in or before the early Cambrian, suggesting that genome defense represents the ancestral role of CpG methylation.

Indexed as

CnidariaDNA MethylationAnimalsCpG IslandsGenomeInvertebratesCnidariacoralDNA methylationepigeneticsgenome defensetransposons

Identifiers

PMID35084499
PMCPMC8857917
OpenAlexW4207036010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.