Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084483›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Prediction of Suicide Attempts Using Clinician Assessment, Patient Self-report, and Electronic Health Records.

Matthew K Nock, Alexander J Millner, Eric L Ross, Chris J Kennedy, Maha Al-Suwaidi, Yuval Barak-Corren, Victor M Castro, Franchesca Castro-Ramirez, Tess Lauricella, Nicole Murman and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Using smartphone surveys to predict next-week suicide attempts.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026
    Article
  5. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Matthew K NockDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Alexander J MillnerDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Eric L RossDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Chris J KennedyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Maha Al-SuwaidiDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Yuval Barak-CorrenDepartment of Bioinformatics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Victor M CastroDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Franchesca Castro-RamirezDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Tess LauricellaDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Nicole MurmanDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Maria PetukhovaDepartment of Healthcare Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Suzanne A BirdDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Ben ReisDepartment of Bioinformatics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jordan W SmollerDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ronald C KesslerDepartment of Healthcare Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Half of the people who die by suicide make a health care visit within 1 month of their death. However, clinicians lack the tools to identify these patients. Objective: To predict suicide attempts within 1 and 6 months of presentation at an emergency department (ED) for psychiatric problems. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study assessed the 1-month and 6-month risk of suicide attempts among 1818 patients presenting to an ED between February 4, 2015, and March 13, 2017, with psychiatric problems. Data analysis was performed from May 1, 2020, to November 19, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Suicide attempts 1 and 6 months after presentation to the ED were defined by combining data from electronic health records (EHRs) with patient 1-month (n = 1102) and 6-month (n = 1220) follow-up surveys. Ensemble machine learning was used to develop predictive models and a risk score for suicide. Results: A total of 1818 patients participated in this study (1016 men [55.9%]; median age, 33 years [IQR, 24-46 years]; 266 Hispanic patients [14.6%]; 1221 non-Hispanic White patients [67.2%], 142 non-Hispanic Black patients [7.8%], 64 non-Hispanic Asian patients [3.5%], and 125 non-Hispanic patients of other race and ethnicity [6.9%]). A total of 137 of 1102 patients (12.9%; weighted prevalence) attempted suicide within 1 month, and a total of 268 of 1220 patients (22.0%; weighted prevalence) attempted suicide within 6 months. Clinicians' assessment alone was little better than chance at predicting suicide attempts, with externally validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.67 for the 1-month model and 0.60 for the 6-month model. Prediction accuracy was slightly higher for models based on EHR data (1-month model: AUC, 0.71; 6 month model: AUC, 0.65) and was best using patient self-reports (1-month model: AUC, 0.76; 6-month model: AUC, 0.77), especially when patient self-reports were combined with EHR and/or clinician data (1-month model: AUC, 0.77; and 6 month model: AUC, 0.79). A model that used only 20 patient self-report questions and an EHR-based risk score performed similarly well (1-month model: AUC, 0.77; 6 month model: AUC, 0.78). In the best 1-month model, 30.7% (positive predicted value) of the patients classified as having highest risk (top 25% of the sample) made a suicide attempt within 1 month of their ED visit, accounting for 64.8% (sensitivity) of all 1-month attempts. In the best 6-month model, 46.0% (positive predicted value) of the patients classified at highest risk made a suicide attempt within 6 months of their ED visit, accounting for 50.2% (sensitivity) of all 6-month attempts. Conclusions and Relevance: This prognostic study suggests that the ability to identify patients at high risk of suicide attempt after an ED visit for psychiatric problems improved using a combination of patient self-reports and EHR data.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPhysician-Patient RelationsSelf ReportAdultFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveSuicide, Attempted

Identifiers

PMID35084483
PMCPMC8796020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.