Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084480›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2022

Efficacy of Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Douglas W Blayney, Ramon Mohanlal, Hryhoriy Adamchuk, Dmitry Valikovich Kirtbaya, Michael Chen, Lihua Du, Stephan Ogenstad, Greg Ginn, Lan Huang, Qingyuan Zhang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03102606 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Study to Evaluate Duration of Severe Neutropenia With Plinabulin Versus Pegfilgrastim in Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Docetaxel Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03102606 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Study to Evaluate Duration of Severe Neutropenia With Plinabulin Versus Pegfilgrastim in Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Docetaxel Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy (Protective 1)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals Inc.Ran2018 to 2021Enrolled105ConditionsChemotherapy-induced NeutropeniaArmsPlinabulin, Pegfilgrastim, Saline Placebo, D5W Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Douglas W BlayneyStanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California.
Ramon MohanlalBeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, New York, New York.
Hryhoriy AdamchukMI Kriviy Rih Oncology Dispensary, Krivoy Rog, Ukraine.
Dmitry Valikovich KirtbayaSBI of Healthcare Oncology Dispensary 2, Ministry of Healthcare of Krasnodar Region 38, Sochi, Russia.
Michael ChenTCM Groups, Inc, Berkeley Heights, New Jersey.
Lihua DuDalian Wanchun Bulin Pharmaceuticals Limited, Dalian, China.
Stephan OgenstadStatogen Consulting, LLC, Wake Forest, North Carolina.
Greg GinnStatogen Consulting, LLC, Wake Forest, North Carolina.
Lan HuangBeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, New York, New York.
Qingyuan ZhangThe Third of Internal Medicine Department, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University · UAStanford Cancer InstituteThird Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and its clinical consequences is an unmet need for which plinabulin, a selective immunomodulating microtubule-binding agent, is being tested. Objective: To demonstrate noninferiority between plinabulin and pegfilgrastim for days of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 in patients with solid tumors treated with docetaxel. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Plinabulin vs Pegfilgrastim for the Prevention of Docetaxel-Induced Neutropenia in Patients With Solid Tumors (PROTECTIVE-1) double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial was performed in multiple centers in China, Russia, Ukraine, and the US. Participants included patients with breast, prostate, or non-small cell lung cancer treated with single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. Data were collected from June 1, 2018, to January 31, 2019. The database was locked on February 18, 2021. Data analysis was based on intention to treat and safety and performed from October 5, 2018, to February 23, 2021. Interventions: Plinabulin, 40 mg, plus placebo or pegfilgrastim, 6 mg, plus placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was day of severe neutropenia in cycle 1. Additional end points included clinical consequences of CIN (febrile neutropenia, hospitalizations, infections, antibiotic use, and modifications of chemotherapy dose), patient-reported outcomes for bone pain score, markers for immune suppression (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] of >5), immature neutrophils (band, promyelocyte, and myelocyte counts >0), and safety. Results: Among the 105 patients included in the analysis (65 [6.19%] women; median age, 59 [range, 31-81] years), the primary end point was met within a noninferiority margin of 0.65 days, with a mean difference of 0.52 days (98.52% CI, 0.40-0.65 days). Grade 4 neutropenia frequency in cycle 1 was not significantly different. Plinabulin had earlier onset of action with less grade 4 neutropenia in week 1 of cycle 1. Plinabulin had fewer adverse clinical consequences with rates of febrile neutropenia (0 of 52 vs 1 of 53 [1.9%]), infections (4 of 52 [7.7%] vs 8 of 53 [15.1%]), chemotherapy dose delay of more than 7 days (2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 3 of 53 [5.7%]), and permanent chemotherapy discontinuation (7 of 52 [13.5%] vs 14 of 53 [26.4%]). Patients receiving plinabulin had significantly less bone pain (difference, -0.67 [95% CI, -1.17 to -0.16]; P = .01) and a better immunosuppressive profile (NLR >5 at day 8, 2 of 52 [3.8%] vs 24 of 51 [46.0%]; P < .001). Plinabulin was well tolerated, with comparable safety to pegfilgrastim. Conclusions and Relevance: Plinabulin has comparable efficacy to pegfilgrastim for the prevention of CIN, with better safety and a better immunosuppressive profile. Plinabulin's same-day dosing compared with pegfilgrastim's next-day dosing offers distinct advantages, including reducing use of health care services. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102606.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDiketopiperazinesDocetaxelDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFilgrastimHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsDiketopiperazinesDocetaxelFilgrastimNPI 2358pegfilgrastimPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID35084480
PMCPMC8796017
OpenAlexW4210381062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.