Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084339›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2022

Understanding Current Needs and Future Expectations of Informal Caregivers for Technology to Support Health and Well-being: National Survey Study.

Kieren J Egan, Patricia Clark, Zahid Deen, Carmen Paputa Dutu, Graham Wilson, Lisa McCann, Marilyn Lennon, Roma Maguire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kieren J EganDigital Health and Wellness Group, Department of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1639-4281
Patricia ClarkCarers Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9172-1564
Zahid DeenThe Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-3634
Carmen Paputa DutuThe Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-7152
Graham WilsonDigital Health and Wellness Group, Department of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2664-1634
Lisa McCannDigital Health and Wellness Group, Department of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-5778
Marilyn LennonDigital Health and Wellness Group, Department of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-2400
Roma MaguireDigital Health and Wellness Group, Department of Computing and Information Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-3447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are approximately 6.5 million informal (unpaid) caregivers in the United Kingdom. Each caregiver plays a critical role in the society, supporting the health and well-being of those who are ill, disabled, or older and who need frequent support. Digital technologies are becoming a ubiquitous part of everyday life for many, but little is known about the real-world impact of technology for those in a caring role, including the abilities of technologies to address the mental and physical impacts of caregiving.

objectiveThis study aims to understand the current and future technology use of caregivers, including digital technologies used to care for themselves and the person they look after.

methodsWe codeveloped a wide range of questions with caregivers and care professionals and delivered this survey both on the web and in paper format (eg, using social networks such as Twitter alongside in-person events). Questions were focused on providing care and looking after caregiver health and well-being. Analyses focused on both quantitative outcomes (frequency counts and Likert questions) and explored free text entries (thematic analysis).

resultsFrom 356 respondents, we identified that caregivers were receptive to, and largely positive about current and future use of technology both for their own care and their caring role (eg, checking in from distance). There were notable concerns, including the risk that technology could replace human contact. We identified several key areas for future work, including communication with health and social care professionals, and the potential for technology to help caregivers with their own health. We also identified several stakeholders (eg, care workers, pharmacy staff, and general practitioners) who could act as suitable points for technology signposting and support.

conclusionsCaregivers are a transient, often difficult to reach population, and this work has collated a large body of knowledge across a diverse group of individuals. Many caregivers, like the rest of society, are realizing the benefits of using everyday technology to help deliver care. It is clear that there is already a high level of dependency on technologies, where future expectations will grow. However, many barriers to digital technology use remain, including a lack of ongoing technology support. Preventive measures linked to technology that can help look after a caregiver's own health appear acceptable, particularly for communicative tools. This collated caregiver knowledge is a call for all stakeholders-academics, policy makers, and practitioners-to take note of these specific challenges, and to ensure that caregiver voices are both heard and fully integrated within the emerging digital health agenda.

Indexed as

caregivingco-designdigital healthhealthmobile phonetechnologywell-being

Identifiers

PMID35084339
PMCPMC8832269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.