Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084297›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology2022

Joel J Maki, Torey Looft

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AnmSystems · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. DraftMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prolonged storage reduces viability ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Turicibacterales protect mice from severeInfection and immunity · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel J MakiFood Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
Torey LooftFood Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
Agricultural Research Service · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three novel, anaerobic, Gram-positive bacteria were isolated from the eggshell of two separate white leghorn chicken flocks and the ileum of a healthy pig, and designated MMM721

Indexed as

ChickensEgg ShellPhylogenyAnimalsBacillotaBacterial Typing TechniquesBase CompositionDNA, BacterialFatty AcidsIleumNucleic Acid HybridizationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASwineDNA, BacterialFatty AcidsRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sanaerobepoultryswineturicibacter

Identifiers

PMID35084297
PMCPMC8895650
OpenAlexW4210733056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.