Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084227›Full record

ArticleBone & joint open2022

Potential benefits, unintended consequences, and future roles of artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery research : a call to emphasize data quality and indications.

Kyle N Kunze, Melissa Orr, Viktor Krebs, Mohit Bhandari, Nicolas S Piuzzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyle N KunzeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0363-3482
Melissa OrrDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Viktor KrebsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mohit BhandariDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Nicolas S PiuzziDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3007-7538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine-learning analytics have gained extensive popularity in recent years due to their clinically relevant applications. A wide range of proof-of-concept studies have demonstrated the ability of these analyses to personalize risk prediction, detect implant specifics from imaging, and monitor and assess patient movement and recovery. Though these applications are exciting and could potentially influence practice, it is imperative to understand when these analyses are indicated and where the data are derived from, prior to investing resources and confidence into the results and conclusions. In this article, we review the current benefits and potential limitations of machine-learning for the orthopaedic surgeon with a specific emphasis on data quality.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tearsarthroplastyArtificial intelligenceclinicianscognitive functionData managementMachine-learningorthopaedic surgeonorthopaedic surgeryOrthopedicsPredictive modellingpreoperative CT scanstotal hip arthroplastytotal joint replacementtotal knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Identifiers

PMID35084227
PMCPMC9047073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.