Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35084071›Full record

Trial reportDepression and anxiety2022

Efficacy of D-cycloserine augmented brief intensive cognitive-behavioural therapy for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomised clinical trial.

Lara J Farrell, Allison M Waters, Evelin Tiralongo, Sharna Mathieu, Matthew McKenzie, Vinay Garbharran, Robert S Ware, Melanie J Zimmer-Gembeck, Harry McConnell, Cassie Lavell and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Depression and anxiety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Ketamine in neuropsychiatric disorders: an update.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Lara J FarrellSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4231-2227
Allison M WatersSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Evelin TiralongoSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Sharna MathieuSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Matthew McKenzieSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Vinay GarbharranSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Robert S WareMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Melanie J Zimmer-GembeckSchool of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Harry McConnellMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Cassie LavellChildren's Centre for Child Anxiety and OCD, Gold Coast, Australia.
Jacinda CadmanChildren's Centre for Child Anxiety and OCD, Gold Coast, Australia.
Thomas H OllendickChild Study Centre, Virginia Polytechnic University, Blacksburg, USA.
Jennifer L HudsonBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Ronald M RapeeCentre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Brett McDermottJames Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Daniel GellerMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Eric A StorchBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Griffith University · AUMacquarie University · AUBaylor College of Medicine · USBlack Dog Institute · AUHarvard University · USJames Cook University · AUVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the efficacy of weight-adjusted D-cycloserine (DCS) (35 or 70 mg) relative to placebo augmentation of intensive exposure therapy for youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in a double-blind, randomised controlled trial, and examine whether antidepressant medication or patient age moderated outcomes.

methodsYouth (n = 100, 7-17 years) with OCD were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either DCS + exposure (n = 49) or placebo + exposure (n = 51). Assessments occurred posttreatment, 1 month later, and at 3 and 6 months. Pills were ingested immediately before sessions.

resultsSignificant improvements on all outcomes were observed at posttreatment, and to 6-month follow-up. Treatment arms did not differ across time, with no significant time-by-medication interactions on symptom severity (T1 to T2 estimate: 9.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -11.2 to -7.4, and estimate -10.7, 95% CI: -12.6 to -8.7), diagnostic severity (T1 to T2 estimate: -2.0, 95% CI: -2.4 to -1.5 and estimate -2.5, 95% CI: -3.0 to -2.0) or global functioning (T1 to T2 estimate: 13.8, 95% CI: 10.6 to 17.0, and estimate 16.6, 95% CI: 13.2 to 19.9). Neither antidepressants at baseline nor age moderated primary outcomes. There were significantly fewer responders/remitters at 1- and 6-month follow-up among youth in the DCS condition stabilised on SSRIs, relative to youth not taking SSRIs.

conclusionsDCS augmented intensive exposure therapy did not result in overall additional benefits relative to placebo. Intensive exposure proved effective in reducing symptoms for the overall sample.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyObsessive-Compulsive DisorderAdolescentAntidepressive AgentsChildCombined Modality TherapyCycloserineHumansTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsCycloserinecognitive-behaviour therapyD-cycloserineexposure therapyOCD

Identifiers

PMID35084071
PMCPMC9303435
OpenAlexW4210466188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.