Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35083878›Full record

Trial reportPhysiological reports2022

Blood pressure and cardiac autonomic adaptations to isometric exercise training: A randomized sham-controlled study.

Anthony Decaux, Jamie J Edwards, Harry T Swift, Philip Hurst, Jordan Hopkins, Jonathan D Wiles, Jamie M O'Driscoll

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05025202 (Blood Pressure and Cardiac Autonomic Adaptations to Isometric Exercise Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05025202 nacompletednot on this map

Blood Pressure and Cardiac Autonomic Adaptations to Isometric Exercise Training: a Randomised Sham-controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCanterbury Christ Church UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsHypertensionArmsIsometric exercise training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anthony DecauxSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1545-0966
Jamie J EdwardsSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7963-2550
Harry T SwiftSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, UK.
Philip HurstSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, UK.
Jordan HopkinsSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, UK.
Jonathan D WilesSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, UK.
Jamie M O'DriscollSchool of Psychology and Life Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5923-4798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isometric exercise training (IET) is increasingly cited for its role in reducing resting blood pressure (BP). Despite this, few studies have investigated a potential sham effect attributing to the success of IET, thus dictating the aim of the present study. Thirty physically inactive males (n = 15) and females (n = 15) were randomly assigned into three groups. The IET group completed a wall squat intervention at 95% peak heart rate (HR) using a prescribed knee joint angle. The sham group performed a parallel intervention, but at an intensity (<75% peak HR) previously identified to be inefficacious over a 4-week training period. No-intervention controls maintained their normal daily activities. Pre- and post-measures were taken for resting and continuous blood pressure and cardiac autonomic modulation. Resting clinic and continuous beat-to-beat systolic (-15.2 ± 9.2 and -7.3 ± 5.6 mmHg), diastolic (-4.6 ± 5 and -4.5 ± 5.1), and mean (-7 ± 4.2 and -7.5 ± 5.3) BP, respectively, all significantly decreased in the IET group compared to sham and no-intervention control. The IET group observed a significant decrease in low-frequency normalized units of heart rate variability concurrent with a significant increase in high-frequency normalized units of heart rate variability compared to both the sham and no-intervention control groups. The findings of the present study reject a nonspecific effect and further support the role of IET as an effective antihypertensive intervention. Clinical Trials ID: NCT05025202.

Indexed as

Autonomic Nervous SystemExerciseBlood PressureFemaleHeartHeart RateHumansMaleblood pressureisometric exercise

Identifiers

PMID35083878
PMCPMC8792514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.