ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging2022
Automatic deep learning multicontrast corpus callosum segmentation in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Genetic Architecture of the Human Corpus Callosum and its Subregions.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
- Corpus Callosum Segmentation on Structural MRI Using Multi-atlas Deformable Registration.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- A Case for Automated Segmentation of MRI Data in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Type II GM1 Gangliosidosis.NeuroSci · 2025Article
- Review
- Detection of Marchiafava Bignami disease using distinct deep learning techniques in medical diagnostics.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Review
- Automatic deep learning multicontrast corpus callosum segmentation in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022Article
- FastSurfer-CC: A robust, accurate, and comprehensive framework for corpus callosum morphometry.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeCorpus callosum (CC) atrophy is predictive of future disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, current segmentation methods are either labor- or computationally intensive. We therefore developed an automated deep learning-based CC segmentation tool and hypothesized that its output would correlate with disability.
methodsA cohort of 631 MS patients (449 females, baseline age 41 ± 11 years) with both 3-dimensional T1-weighted and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI was used for the development. Data from 204 patients were manually segmented to train convolutional neural networks in extracting the midsagittal intracranial and CC areas. Remaining data were used to compare segmentations with FreeSurfer and benchmark the outputs with regard to clinical correlations. A 1.5 and 3 Tesla reproducibility cohort of 9 MS patients evaluated the segmentation robustness.
resultsThe deep learning-based tool was accurate in selecting the appropriate slice for segmentation (98% accuracy within 3 mm of the manual ground truth) and segmenting the CC (Dice coefficient .88-.91) and intracranial areas (.97-.98). The accuracy was lower with higher atrophy. Reproducibility was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient > .90) for T1-weighted scans and moderate-good for FLAIR (.74-.75). Segmentations were associated with baseline and future (average follow-up time 6-7 years) Expanded Disability Status Scale (ρ = -.13 to -.24) and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (r = .18-.29) scores.
conclusionsWe present a fully automatic deep learning-based CC segmentation tool optimized to modern imaging in MS with clinical correlations on par with computationally expensive alternatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.