Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35083801›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging2022

Accuracy of bedside bidimensional transcranial ultrasound versus tomodensitometric measurement of the third ventricle.

Philippe Lasselin, Sebastien Grousson, Edmundo Pereira Souza Netto, Baptiste Balanca, Anne Terrier, Frederic Dailler, Julie Haesbaert, Nawele Boublay, Benjamin Gory, Moncef Berhouma and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Accuracy of bedside bidimensional transcranial ultrasound versus tomodensitometric measurement of the third ventricle.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Philippe LasselinHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon University Hospital, Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6877-5863
Sebastien GroussonHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon University Hospital, Bron, France.
Edmundo Pereira Souza NettoDepartment of Anesthesia, Montauban Hospital, Montauban, France.
Baptiste BalancaHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon University Hospital, Bron, France.
Anne TerrierHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon University Hospital, Bron, France.
Frederic DaillerHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon University Hospital, Bron, France.
Julie HaesbaertHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale Évaluation Recherche, Lyon, France.
Nawele BoublayHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle Information Médicale Évaluation Recherche, Lyon, France.
Benjamin GoryDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Lyon University Hospital, Bron, France.
Moncef BerhoumaHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Neurosurgery, Lyon University Hospital, Bron, France.
Anne-Claire LukaszewiczHospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer, Lyon University Hospital, Bron, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRATECA - Applications Technologie Avancée · FRCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeTo evaluate the accuracy of transcranial duplex sonography (TCS) for measuring the diameter of the third ventricle (DTV) and the brain midline shift (MLS), as compared to cerebral CT.

methodsSingle-center retrospective study including 177 patients admitted to the neurological intensive care unit (NICU). We studied the correlation between TCS and CT measurements of DTV and MLS using a Bland-Altman analysis. The best threshold of DTV to diagnose acute hydrocephalus was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

resultsWe analyzed 177 pairs of CT-TCS measurements for DTV and 165 for MLS. The mean time interval between CT and TCS was 87 ± 73 minutes. Median DTV measurement on CT was 4 ± 3 mm, and 5 ± 3 mm by TCS. Median MLS on CT was 2 ± 3 mm, and 2 ± 4 mm by TCS. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r

conclusionsTCS seems to be a reliable and accurate bedside technique for measuring both DTV and MLS, which might allow detection of acute hydrocephalus among NICU patients.

Indexed as

HydrocephalusThird VentricleHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranialbrain midline shifthydrocephalustranscranial duplex sonography

Identifiers

PMID35083801
PMCPMC9540242
OpenAlexW4210339563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.