Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35083651›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Older Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Their Perspectives on Prognostic Information: a Qualitative Study.

Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir, Nataly R Espinoza Suarez, Susan Curtis, Annika T Beck, Ian Hargraves, Kevin Shaw, Susan P Y Wong, LaTonya J Hickson, Kasey R Boehmer, Brigid Amberg and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient engagement during the transition from nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease to dialysis: A meta-ethnography.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk-based referral model to nephrologist specialist care in Stockholm.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Kidney Transplant Clinicians' Perceptions of Palliative Care for Patients With Failing Allografts in the US: A Mixed Methods Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Bjorg ThorsteinsdottirDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, USA. Thorsteinsdottir.bjorg@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4397-728X
Nataly R Espinoza SuarezKnowledge Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Susan CurtisBiomedical Ethics Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Annika T BeckBiomedical Ethics Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ian HargravesKnowledge Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kevin ShawKnowledge Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Susan P Y WongUniversity of Washington and VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
LaTonya J HicksonKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kasey R BoehmerKnowledge Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brigid AmbergDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Erin DahlenDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Cristina WirtzDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Robert C AlbrightDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ashok KumbamuKern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jon C TilburtBiomedical Ethics Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Erica J SuttonBiomedical Ethics Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS UL1 Supplement - Dr. Timothy Curry)UL1TR002377 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI VESNA D GAROVIC · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Minnesota Learning Health System Mentored Career Development Program (MN-LHS)K12HS026379 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BEEBE, TIMOTHY, LINZER, MARK · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
Mesenchymal stem cell senescence in diabetic nephropathy (K23 COVID Admin Supplement)K23DK109134 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI HICKSON, LATONYA J · 2016 to 2021
$1.0M
Evidence Based Encounter Decision Aid for Elderly Patients to Promote Shared Decision Making on Treatment Choice in End Stage Renal DiseaseK23AG051679 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI THORSTEINSDOTTIR, BJOERG · 2016 to 2020
$908k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026379NCATS NIH HHS L30 TR002972NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002377NIA NIH HHS K23 AG051679NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK109134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognostic information is key to shared decision-making, particularly in life-limiting illness like advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).

objectiveTo understand the prognostic information preferences expressed by older patients with CKD. DESIGN AND

participantsQualitative study of 28 consecutively enrolled patients over 65 years of age with non-dialysis dependent CKD stages 3b-5, receiving care in a multi-disciplinary CKD clinic. APPROACH: Semi-structured telephone or in-person interviews to explore patients' preference for and perceived value of individualized prognostic information. Interviews were analyzed using inductive content analysis. KEY

resultsWe completed interviews with 28 patients (77.7 ± SD 6.8 years, 69% men). Patients varied in their preference for prognostic information and more were interested in their risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) than in life expectancy. Many conflated ESKD risk with risk of death, perceiving a binary choice between dialysis and quick decline and death. Patients expressed that prognostic information would allow them to plan, take care of important business, and think about their treatment options. Patients were accepting of prognostic uncertainty and imagined leveraging it to nurture hope or motivate them to better manage risk factors. They endorsed the desire to receive prognosis of life expectancy even though it may be hard to accept or difficult to talk about but worried it could create helplessness for other patients in their situation.

conclusionMost, but not all, patients were interested in prognostic information and could see its value in motivating behavior change and allowing planning. Some patients expressed concern that information on life expectancy might cause depression and hopelessness. Therefore, prognostic information is most appropriate as part of a clinical conversation that fosters shared decision-making and helps patients consider treatment risks, benefits, and burdens in context of their lives.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal Insufficiency, ChronicDecision MakingFemaleHumansMalePrognosisQualitative ResearchRenal Dialysiscommunicationdialysis riskpalliative careprognosisshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID35083651
PMCPMC8971255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.