ArticleLa Radiologia medica2022
Chest X-ray versus chest computed tomography for outcome prediction in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early chest x-ray severity assessed by the MBrixia score is associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Early association between respiratory mechanics and radiological changes in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with COVID-19.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Perioperative Factors and Radiographic Severity Scores for Predicting the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation After Arterial Switch Surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2024Article
- COVID-19: An overview on possible transmission ways, sampling matrices and diagnosis.BioImpacts : BI · 2024Review
- TVFx - CoVID-19 X-Ray images classification approach using neural networks based feature thresholding technique.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Discovering associations between radiological features and COVID-19 patients' deterioration.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Tips and Tricks in Thoracic Radiology for Beginners: A Findings-Based Approach.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- Qualitative and semi-quantitative ultrasound assessment in delta and Omicron Covid-19 patients: data from high volume reference center.Infectious agents and cancer · 2023Article
- Repeated Lung Ultrasound versus Chest X-ray-Which One Predicts Better Clinical Outcome in COVID-19?Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Automated prediction of COVID-19 severity upon admission by chest X-ray images and clinical metadata aiming at accuracy and explainability.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Exploring Radiologists' Burnout in the COVID-19 Era: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Radiation Recall Pneumonitis: The Open Challenge in Differential Diagnosis of Pneumonia Induced by Oncological Treatments.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Chest X-ray severity score Brixia: From marker of early COVID-19 infection to predictor of worse outcome in internal medicine wards.European journal of clinical investigation · 2023Article
- Gender Medicine in Clinical Radiology Practice.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Chest X-ray in Emergency Radiology: What Artificial Intelligence Applications Are Available?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Prognostic Model of ICU Admission Risk in Patients with COVID-19 Infection Using Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Brixia and qSOFA Scores, Coagulation Factors and Blood Values in Spring versus Autumn 2021 Infection in Pregnant Critical COVID-19 Patients: A Preliminary Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Respiratory rate index utility in high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in COVID-19 pneumonia; what are the perfect boundaries?Respiratory investigation · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the prognostic value of chest X-ray (CXR) and chest computed tomography (CT) in a group of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. For this study, we retrospectively selected a cohort of 106 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who underwent both CXR and chest CT at admission. For each patient, the pulmonary involvement was ranked by applying the Brixia score for CXR and the percentage of well-aerated lung (WAL) for CT. The Brixia score was assigned at admission (A-Brixia score) and during hospitalization. During hospitalization, only the highest score (H-Brixia score) was considered. At admission, the percentage of WAL (A-CT%WAL) was quantified using a dedicated software. On logistic regression analyses, H-Brixia score was the most effective radiological marker for predicting in-hospital mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation. Additionally, A-CT%WAL did not provide substantial advantages in the risk stratification of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 compared to A-Brixia score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.