ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022
Automated 2D Slice-Based Skull Stripping Multi-View Ensemble Model on NFBS and IBSR Datasets.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CSAMDT: Conditional Self Attention Memory-Driven Transformers for Radiology Report Generation from Chest X-Ray.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Dimensionality Reduction Hybrid U-Net for Brain Extraction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- GUBS: Graph-Based Unsupervised Brain Segmentation in MRI Images.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposed and evaluated a two-dimensional (2D) slice-based multi-view U-Net (MVU-Net) architecture for skull stripping. The proposed model fused all three TI-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) views, i.e., axial, coronal, and sagittal. This 2D method performed equally well as a three-dimensional (3D) model of skull stripping. while using fewer computational resources. The predictions of all three views were fused linearly, producing a final brain mask with better accuracy and efficiency. Meanwhile, two publicly available datasets-the Internet Brain Segmentation Repository (IBSR) and Neurofeedback Skull-stripped (NFBS) repository-were trained and tested. The MVU-Net, U-Net, and skip connection U-Net (SCU-Net) architectures were then compared. For the IBSR dataset, compared to U-Net and SC-UNet, the MVU-Net architecture attained better mean dice score coefficient (DSC), sensitivity, and specificity, at 0.9184, 0.9397, and 0.9908, respectively. Similarly, the MVU-Net architecture achieved better mean DSC, sensitivity, and specificity, at 0.9681, 0.9763, and 0.9954, respectively, than the U-Net and SC-UNet for the NFBS dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.