ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022
A Deep Learning-Based and Fully Automated Pipeline for Thoracic Aorta Geometric Analysis and Planning for Endovascular Repair from Computed Tomography.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Vascular and Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- From Bits to Bedside: From Data to Knowledge in Vascular Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AMR-VSF: an adaptive memory correction framework for robust 3D CT aorta segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- From Case Studies to Cohort of Patients: Automating FSI Simulations to Uncover Downstream Effects of Ascending Aortic Grafts.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- A Computational Pipeline for Patient-Specific Modeling of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: From Medical Image to Finite Element Analysis.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Patient-specific mixed reality for venus P-valve implantation: A novel approach to procedural planning.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
- Influence of Aortoiliac Geometry on Non-Occlusive Thrombotic Risk Following Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- State-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods for pre-operative planning of cardiothoracic surgery and interventions: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-powered solutions for automated aortic diameter measurement in computed tomography: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Review
- A fully automated deep learning approach for coronary artery segmentation and comprehensive characterization.APL bioengineering · 2024Article
- Application of three-dimensional printing in the planning and execution of aortic aneurysm repair.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Deep learning techniques for imaging diagnosis and treatment of aortic aneurysm.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Assessment of shape-based features ability to predict the ascending aortic aneurysm growth.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feasibility assessment and planning of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) require computed tomography (CT)-based analysis of geometric aortic features to identify adequate landing zones (LZs) for endograft deployment. However, no consensus exists on how to take the necessary measurements from CT image data. We trained and applied a fully automated pipeline embedding a convolutional neural network (CNN), which feeds on 3D CT images to automatically segment the thoracic aorta, detects proximal landing zones (PLZs), and quantifies geometric features that are relevant for TEVAR planning. For 465 CT scans, the thoracic aorta and pulmonary arteries were manually segmented; 395 randomly selected scans with the corresponding ground truth segmentations were used to train a CNN with a 3D U-Net architecture. The remaining 70 scans were used for testing. The trained CNN was embedded within computational geometry processing pipeline which provides aortic metrics of interest for TEVAR planning. The resulting metrics included aortic arch centerline radius of curvature, proximal landing zones (PLZs) maximum diameters, angulation, and tortuosity. These parameters were statistically analyzed to compare standard arches vs. arches with a common origin of the innominate and left carotid artery (CILCA). The trained CNN yielded a mean Dice score of 0.95 and was able to generalize to 9 pathological cases of thoracic aortic aneurysm, providing accurate segmentations. CILCA arches were characterized by significantly greater angulation (p = 0.015) and tortuosity (p = 0.048) in PLZ 3 vs. standard arches. For both arch configurations, comparisons among PLZs revealed statistically significant differences in maximum zone diameters (p < 0.0001), angulation (p < 0.0001), and tortuosity (p < 0.0001). Our tool allows clinicians to obtain objective and repeatable PLZs mapping, and a range of automatically derived complex aortic metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.