Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35083618›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022

A Deep Learning-Based and Fully Automated Pipeline for Thoracic Aorta Geometric Analysis and Planning for Endovascular Repair from Computed Tomography.

Simone Saitta, Francesco Sturla, Alessandro Caimi, Alessandra Riva, Maria Chiara Palumbo, Giovanni Nano, Emiliano Votta, Alessandro Della Corte, Mattia Glauber, Dante Chiappino and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. AMR-VSF: an adaptive memory correction framework for robust 3D CT aorta segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient-specific mixed reality for venus P-valve implantation: A novel approach to procedural planning.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Simone SaittaDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3974-5945
Francesco SturlaDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7317-304X
Alessandro CaimiDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2856-1347
Alessandra RivaDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9648-7711
Maria Chiara PalumboDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7579-7099
Giovanni NanoClinical Research Unit and Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9680-6014
Emiliano VottaDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7115-0151
Alessandro Della CorteDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Unit of Cardiac Surgery, V. Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1782-0270
Mattia GlauberMinimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Unit, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0443-8179
Dante ChiappinoDepartment of Radiology, CNR (National Council of Research), Tuscany Region 'Gabriele Monasterio' Foundation (FTGM), Massa, Italy.
Massimiliano M Marrocco-TrischittaClinical Research Unit and Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy. massimiliano.marroccotrischitta@grupposandonato.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1707-9627
Alberto RedaelliDepartment of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9020-2188
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITPolitecnico di Milano · ITFondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio · ITIstituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feasibility assessment and planning of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) require computed tomography (CT)-based analysis of geometric aortic features to identify adequate landing zones (LZs) for endograft deployment. However, no consensus exists on how to take the necessary measurements from CT image data. We trained and applied a fully automated pipeline embedding a convolutional neural network (CNN), which feeds on 3D CT images to automatically segment the thoracic aorta, detects proximal landing zones (PLZs), and quantifies geometric features that are relevant for TEVAR planning. For 465 CT scans, the thoracic aorta and pulmonary arteries were manually segmented; 395 randomly selected scans with the corresponding ground truth segmentations were used to train a CNN with a 3D U-Net architecture. The remaining 70 scans were used for testing. The trained CNN was embedded within computational geometry processing pipeline which provides aortic metrics of interest for TEVAR planning. The resulting metrics included aortic arch centerline radius of curvature, proximal landing zones (PLZs) maximum diameters, angulation, and tortuosity. These parameters were statistically analyzed to compare standard arches vs. arches with a common origin of the innominate and left carotid artery (CILCA). The trained CNN yielded a mean Dice score of 0.95 and was able to generalize to 9 pathological cases of thoracic aortic aneurysm, providing accurate segmentations. CILCA arches were characterized by significantly greater angulation (p = 0.015) and tortuosity (p = 0.048) in PLZ 3 vs. standard arches. For both arch configurations, comparisons among PLZs revealed statistically significant differences in maximum zone diameters (p < 0.0001), angulation (p < 0.0001), and tortuosity (p < 0.0001). Our tool allows clinicians to obtain objective and repeatable PLZs mapping, and a range of automatically derived complex aortic metrics.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationDeep LearningEndovascular ProceduresAorta, ThoracicAortographyBlood Vessel ProsthesisComputed Tomography AngiographyHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeAortaAutomatic segmentationComputational geometryCTTEVAR

Identifiers

PMID35083618
PMCPMC8921448
OpenAlexW4210316092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.