ArticleClinical rheumatology2022
The role of anti-ribosomal P autoantibodies in the prediction of neuropsychiatric damage in systemic lupus erythematosus based on CSTAR cohort (XIV).
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Attribution of psychiatric manifestations to systemic lupus erythematosus in Chinese patients: A retrospective study.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Predictive factors of psychiatric syndrome in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify the predictive value of anti-ribosomal P protein (anti-RibP) antibodies on the accrual of neuropsychiatric damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in a large cohort in the Chinese SLE Treatment and Research group (CSTAR) database.
methodsThis single-center prospective study was conducted based on data from the CSTAR registry. At baseline, we collected demographic characteristics, autoantibody profiles, clinical manifestations, disease activity status, and organ damage. Follow-up data were collected by reviewing clinical records and telephone interviews. Anti-RibP antibodies were identified by immunoblot containing all three native RibP (P0, P1, P2) antigenic proteins.
resultsOf 2395 SLE patients with complete follow-up data, 659 (27.5%) were anti-RibP antibody positive. At baseline, positive anti-RibP antibodies were associated with a higher proportion of neurological involvement (𝑃 < 0.05). During follow-up, patients with positive anti-RibP antibodies were more likely to accumulate neuropsychiatric damage (adjusted HR = 3.8, 95% CI 2.7-57), p < 0.001). What is more, the cumulative probability of new-onset neurological involvement increased gradually in anti-RibP antibody-positive patients.
conclusionAnti-RibP antibodies can provide information about not only organ involvement at baseline, but also neuropsychiatric damage accrual and new-onset neurological involvement during follow-up. We suggested that anti-RibP antibody detection should be done in the newly diagnosed SLE patients to predict organ involvement and even the accumulation of neuropsychiatric damage. KEY POINTS: • Positive anti-RibP antibodies were associated with baseline neurological involvement. • Baseline positive anti-RibP antibodies can predict the neuropsychiatric damage accrual and new-onset neurological involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.