Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2022
Comparison of clinical effects of meperidine and sufentanil added to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04446715 (Comparison of Clinical Effects of Meperidine and Sufentanil Added to 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Clinical Effects of Meperidine and Sufentanil Added to 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective of this study was to compare the effect of adding meperidine or sufentanil to hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery (CD) under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was the first analgesic request time, and secondary outcomes included an analgesic requirement in the first 24 h and intraoperative and postoperative side effects.
methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial in which patients were allocated into two groups. One group received preservative-free meperidine 12.5 mg (1 mL) in addition to 0.5% 10 mg (2 mL) of hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. The other group received sufentanil 5 μg (1 mL) added to 0.5% 10 mg (2 mL) of hyperbaric bupivacaine.
resultsA total of 60 parturients were included in the study, 30 patients in each group. Time to first analgesic request was significantly longer in the meperidine group (400.0 ± 142.1 min) compared to (274.0 ± 104.1 min) in the sufentanil group (P < 0.0001). Around 73% of the parturients in the sufentanil group required analgesics at 4 h compared to 13% in the meperidine group (P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in postoperative pruritus, nausea and vomiting, in addition to shivering. As for surgeon satisfaction, 56.7% reported excellent abdominal muscle relaxation during the surgery in the meperidine group compared to 10% in the sufentanil group (P < 0.0001).
conclusionMeperidine was superior to sufentanil in terms of improved analgesia, intraoperative postoperative pruritus, and shivering, as well as increased surgeon satisfaction in women undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04446715).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.