ArticleEuropean radiology2022
Deep learning in CT colonography: differentiating premalignant from benign colorectal polyps.
Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Association of FIT-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening with Earlier Disease Detection: The Romanian Experience.Cancers · 2026Article
- Y-Polyp: research on devices for detecting colorectal polyps with limited samples.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Impact of Annotation Level on Multisequence MRI Models for Preoperative Microvascular Invasion Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Effect of artificial intelligence-aided differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management.European radiology · 2025Article
- PEDRA-EFB0: colorectal cancer prognostication using deep learning with patch embeddings and dual residual attention.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Multiclassification of Colorectal Polyps from Colonoscopy Images Using AI for Early Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research status and trends of deep learning in colorectal cancer (2011-2023): Bibliometric analysis and visualization.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Validation of multiple deep learning models for colorectal tumor differentiation with endoscopic ultrasound images: a dual-center study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Achieving sub-millisievert CT colonography for accurate colorectal tumor detection using smart examination protocols: a prospective self-controlled study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Is the Transverse Colon Overlooked? Establishing a Comprehensive Colonoscopy Database from a Multicenter Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances in colorectal cancer screening: technological innovations, guideline discrepancies, and individualized strategies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Examining feature extraction and classification modules in machine learning for diagnosis of low-dose computed tomographic screening-detectedJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Novel research and future prospects of artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and treatment.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- Detection of Colorectal Polyps from Colonoscopy Using Machine Learning: A Survey on Modern Techniques.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The role of deep learning in diagnosing colorectal cancer.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2023Review
- On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the differentiation of premalignant from benign colorectal polyps detected by CT colonography using deep learning.
methodsIn this retrospective analysis of an average risk colorectal cancer screening sample, polyps of all size categories and morphologies were manually segmented on supine and prone CT colonography images and classified as premalignant (adenoma) or benign (hyperplastic polyp or regular mucosa) according to histopathology. Two deep learning models SEG and noSEG were trained on 3D CT colonography image subvolumes to predict polyp class, and model SEG was additionally trained with polyp segmentation masks. Diagnostic performance was validated in an independent external multicentre test sample. Predictions were analysed with the visualisation technique Grad-CAM++.
resultsThe training set consisted of 107 colorectal polyps in 63 patients (mean age: 63 ± 8 years, 40 men) comprising 169 polyp segmentations. The external test set included 77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 polyp segmentations. Model SEG achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.83 and 80% sensitivity at 69% specificity for differentiating premalignant from benign polyps. Model noSEG yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.75, 80% sensitivity at 44% specificity, and an average Grad-CAM++ heatmap score of ≥ 0.25 in 90% of polyp tissue.
conclusionsIn this proof-of-concept study, deep learning enabled the differentiation of premalignant from benign colorectal polyps detected with CT colonography and the visualisation of image regions important for predictions. The approach did not require polyp segmentation and thus has the potential to facilitate the identification of high-risk polyps as an automated second reader. KEY POINTS: • Non-invasive deep learning image analysis may differentiate premalignant from benign colorectal polyps found in CT colonography scans. • Deep learning autonomously learned to focus on polyp tissue for predictions without the need for prior polyp segmentation by experts. • Deep learning potentially improves the diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening by allowing for a more precise selection of patients who would benefit from endoscopic polypectomy, especially for patients with polyps of 6-9 mm size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.