Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35083517›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022

Frequency and causes of self-medication in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, North of Iran, 2018-2019.

Shirin Parvinroo, Hossein Rouhi Khalkhali Pargam, Rastin Hosseinzadeh Asli, Elahe Rafiei, Shadman Nemati

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shirin ParvinrooDepartment of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Hossein Rouhi Khalkhali PargamDepartment of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Rastin Hosseinzadeh AsliOtorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Amir Al-Momenin Hospital, 4139637459, Rasht, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2614-2205
Elahe RafieiRazi Clinical Research Development Unit, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Shadman NematiOtorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Amir Al-Momenin Hospital, 4139637459, Rasht, Iran. drshadmannemati_ent@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5246-1023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a frequent respiratory disease. As self-medication is a common issue in the world, this study aimed to estimate its frequency in patients with CRS.

methods144 CRS patients referred to a university hospital, were evaluated for self-medication, included type, duration, frequency, and its causes, their SNOT-22 questionnaire and Lund-MacKay scores. The data were analyzed using SPSS v.21 and the level of significance was considered as P ≥ 0.05.

results30.6% of the cases used self-medication (65.9% used chemical drugs and 63.6% used herbal drugs), not associated with their age, gender, educational or economic level. The most common chemical drugs were antibiotics, analgesics and decongestants (75.9%, 55.2% and 10.3%, respectively) and the most common non-pharmaceutical agents included steam inhalation and herbal infusions (71.4%). The efficacy of self-medication was rated as "none" to "little" in 54.64% of cases. The mean SNOT-22 score was 59.54 ± 10.93 and 73.27 ± 8.12 in cases without and with self-medication (P = 0.034), and the mean Lund-MacKay score was 11.8 ± 5.3 and 17.2 ± 4.3 in cases without and with self-medication, respectively (P = 0.002). The top reasons for self-medication were "considering the disease unimportant" and believing chemical drugs being "harmful", "expensive", or "non-effective". Most patients who used self-medication did "not" advise it to others (80%).

conclusionThe high rate of self-medication in CRS patients calls for greater attention to this issue in these patients. It seems that self-medication is significantly associated with more severe grades of disease and lower QOL in CRS cases.

Indexed as

RhinitisSinusitisChronic DiseaseHumansIranProspective StudiesQuality of LifeHerbal medicineMedicineOver the counterPharmaceutical preparationsRhinosinusitisSelf-medicationTraditional

Identifiers

PMID35083517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.