Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35083317›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2022

Computed tomography lung parenchymal descriptions in routine radiological reporting have diagnostic and prognostic utility in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary hypertension associated with lung disease.

Krit Dwivedi, Robin Condliffe, Michael Sharkey, Robert Lewis, Samer Alabed, Smitha Rajaram, Catherine Hill, Laura Saunders, Peter Metherall, Faisal Alandejani and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pulmonary hypertension associated with lung diseases.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Krit DwivediDept of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Medical School, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4949-4550
Robin CondliffePulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospitals, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3492-4143
Michael SharkeyDept of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Robert LewisPulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospitals, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Samer AlabedDept of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Medical School, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9960-7587
Smitha RajaramDept of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Catherine HillDept of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Laura SaundersDept of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
Peter MetherallDept of Radiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Faisal AlandejaniDept of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Medical School, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1227-401X
Dheyaa AlkhanfarDept of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Medical School, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4726-7365
Jim M WildDept of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
Haiping LuDept of Computer Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
David G KielyDept of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Medical School, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0184-6502
Andrew J SwiftDept of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBRoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBHealth First · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation SP/14/6/31350Medical Research Council MR/M008894/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and lung disease may pose a diagnostic dilemma between idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) and PH associated with lung disease (PH-CLD). The prognostic impact of common computed tomography (CT) parenchymal features is unknown.

methods660 IPAH and PH-CLD patients assessed between 2001 and 2019 were included. Reports for all CT scans 1 year prior to diagnosis were analysed for common lung parenchymal patterns. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed.

resultsAt univariate analysis of the whole cohort, centrilobular ground-glass (CGG) changes (hazard ratio, HR 0.29) and ground-glass opacification (HR 0.53) predicted improved survival, while honeycombing (HR 2.79), emphysema (HR 2.09) and fibrosis (HR 2.38) predicted worse survival (all p<0.001). Fibrosis was an independent predictor after adjusting for baseline demographics, PH severity and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (HR 1.37, p<0.05). Patients with a clinical diagnosis of IPAH who had an absence of reported parenchymal lung disease (IPAH-noLD) demonstrated superior survival to patients diagnosed with either IPAH who had coexistent CT lung disease or PH-CLD (2-year survival of 85%, 60% and 46%, respectively, p<0.05). CGG changes were present in 23.3% of IPAH-noLD and 5.8% of PH-CLD patients. There was no significant difference in survival between IPAH-noLD patients with or without CGG changes. PH-CLD patients with fibrosis had worse survival than those with emphysema.

interpretationRoutine clinical reports of CT lung parenchymal disease identify groups of patients with IPAH and PH-CLD with significantly different prognoses. Isolated CGG changes are not uncommon in IPAH but are not associated with worse survival.

Identifiers

PMID35083317
PMCPMC8784758
OpenAlexW4205916911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.