ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021
Deep Neural Network-Aided Histopathological Analysis of Myocardial Injury.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning-driven 3-D histopathology method: a pipeline for cellular-resolution myocarditis analysis.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026Article
- Intraoperative applications of artificial intelligence for augmented parathyroid gland recognition: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2025Review
- A review of evaluation approaches for explainable AI with applications in cardiology.Artificial intelligence review · 2024Article
- What Is Machine Learning, Artificial Neural Networks and Deep Learning?-Examples of Practical Applications in Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- 4D Light-sheet imaging and interactive analysis of cardiac contractility in zebrafish larvae.APL bioengineering · 2023Article
- Light sheet imaging and interactive analysis of the cardiac structure in neonatal mice.Journal of biophotonics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks have become the mainstream approach for analyzing and interpreting histology images. In this study, we established and validated an interpretable DNN model to assess endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) data of patients with myocardial injury. Deep learning models were used to extract features and classify EMB histopathological images of heart failure cases diagnosed with either ischemic cardiomyopathy or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and non-failing cases (organ donors without a history of heart failure). We utilized the gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) technique to emphasize injured regions, providing an entry point to assess the dominant morphology in the process of a comprehensive evaluation. To visualize clustered regions of interest (ROI), we utilized uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) embedding for dimension reduction. We further implemented a multi-model ensemble mechanism to improve the quantitative metric (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC) to 0.985 and 0.992 on ROI-level and case-level, respectively, outperforming the achievement of 0.971 ± 0.017 and 0.981 ± 0.020 based on the sub-models. Collectively, this new methodology provides a robust and interpretive framework to explore local histopathological patterns, facilitating the automatic and high-throughput quantification of cardiac EMB analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.