ArticleCentral European journal of urology2021
Pain after midurethral sling; the underestimated role of mesh removal.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Midurethral Sling Surgery: Impacts on Sexual Function and Approaches to Complications.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Regenerative Medicine Approaches to Stress Urinary Incontinence.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Long-term Survival of Midurethral Mesh Slings for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Quality of life outcomes after transobturator tape full removal surgeries: A monocentric experience.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Mesh Extraction Surgery and Laser Treatment for Pain After Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery: A Case Series.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate the results of midurethral sling (MUS) removal in women who have pain as their single complication of MUS. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective chart study supplemented with a cross sectional questionnaire. Women who underwent MUS removal for pain as the solitary reason for removal between 2004 and 2018 were included. Primary outcome was change in pain levels assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (range 0-10). Secondary outcome was the recurrence of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
resultsTwenty-six of 31 patients returned the questionnaire. Median medical file follow-up was 12 months (range 2-66) and 25 months (range 5-104) regarding questionnaires. VAS pain score dropped from 7.8 (SD 1.9) at baseline to 4.5 (SD 3.2) at follow-up (p <.00). Seven (23%) patients were pain-free. Patients undergoing partial vaginal resection (n = 6) had a VAS pain score decrease of 4.7 (p = .02) versus 2.7 (p = .02) for complete vaginal removal (n = 14). Twenty-three (89%) patients experienced SUI at follow-up, whereof 10 (45%) reported (almost) no incidents of SUI.
conclusionsMUS removal is a viable and safe option with a significant drop in VAS pain score in patients with chronic pain after MUS placement. A post-operative increase of SUI and a possible renewed wish for SUI treatment have to be considered. This should not be a reason to refrain from information and/or referral for surgical removal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.