Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35083046›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Engagement of older adults in regional health innovation: The ECOTECH concept mapping project.

Heather McNeil, Josephine McMurray, Kerry Byrne, Kelly Grindrod, Paul Stolee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather McNeilSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Josephine McMurrayLazaridis School of Business and Economics/Health Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Brantford, ON, Canada.
Kerry ByrneSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Kelly GrindrodSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Paul StoleeSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5685-0843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRegional health innovation ecosystems can activate collaboration and support planning, self-management and development and commercialization of innovations. We sought to understand how older adults and their caregivers can be meaningfully engaged in regional health innovation ecosystems focused on health and aging-related technology innovation.

methodsA six-phase concept mapping technique gathered data over six time points across Canada. Brainstorming conducted online and in person identified engagement ideas. Statements were sorted by similarity and rated by participants on importance and feasibility. Qualitative approaches and multidimensional scaling, hierarchical cluster analysis, descriptive statistics and

resultsSixty-two unique ideas were assembled into a seven-cluster framework of priorities for engagement in regional health innovation ecosystems including public forums, co-production and partnerships, engagement, linkage and exchange, developing cultural capacity, advocacy and investment in the ecosystem.

conclusionsThis study identified a framework of priorities for directions and strategies for older adult and caregiver engagement in regional health innovation ecosystems. Next steps include collaborations to develop regional health innovation ecosystems that actively engage older adults and their caregivers in health and aging-related technology innovation.

Indexed as

Agingco-designengagementgeriatrics/gerontologyinnovation

Identifiers

PMID35083046
PMCPMC8785349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.