ArticleOxidative medicine and cellular longevity2022
Diet-Derived Circulating Antioxidants and Risk of Stroke: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Article in Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- COVID-19, inflammatory cytokines, and digestive system cancers: a bidirectional Mendelian study and mediation analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Analysis of diet-related stroke disease burden in China from 1990 to 2021 and projections for 2025-2044.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Antioxidants and the risk of stroke: results from NHANES and two-sample Mendelian randomization study.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Does Walking Have an Association with Osteoarthritis? A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Review
- The association between diets and periodontitis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- The association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and delirium in ischemic stroke patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- COVID-19 susceptibility and severity for dyslipidemia: A mendelian randomization investigation.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Genetic liability for diet-derived circulating antioxidants, oxidative stress, and risk of osteoarthritis: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Higher oxidative balance score decreases risk of stroke in US adults: evidence from a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOxidative stress is crucial in stroke pathogenesis. Many cohort-based studies suggested that the intake of exogenous antioxidants originated from food may prevent stroke. However, the corresponding randomized controlled trials did not show diet-derived antioxidants have a protective effect on stroke.
objectivesTo examine the association of genetically proxied diet-derived antioxidants with stroke risk using Mendelian randomization.
methodsWe performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the causal effect of diet-derived antioxidants on stroke risk. For exposure data, we extracted genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) that are strongly associated with frequently used diet-derived antioxidants, including vitamin C, vitamin E (
resultsAccording to the primary MR estimations and further sensitivity analyses, we established two robust associations after Bonferroni correction: genetically proxied circulating
conclusionOur study revealed a protective impact of genetic susceptibility to high circulating
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.