Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35082806›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2021

State of the Art of Genetic Engineering in Potato: From the First Report to Its Future Potential.

Vanesa Nahirñak, Natalia I Almasia, Matías N González, Gabriela A Massa, Cecilia A Décima Oneto, Sergio E Feingold, Horacio E Hopp, Cecilia Vazquez Rovere

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome Editing in Root and Tuber Crop Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Biofortification of potato nutrition.Journal of advanced research · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. PotatoBSLnc: a curated repository of potato long noncoding RNAs in response to biotic stress.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. CRISPR/Cas9 editing ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanesa NahirñakInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular, UEDD INTA-CONICET, Hurlingham, Argentina.
Natalia I AlmasiaInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular, UEDD INTA-CONICET, Hurlingham, Argentina.
Matías N GonzálezLaboratorio de Agrobiotecnología, IPADS (INTA - CONICET), Balcarce, Argentina.
Gabriela A MassaLaboratorio de Agrobiotecnología, IPADS (INTA - CONICET), Balcarce, Argentina.
Cecilia A Décima OnetoLaboratorio de Agrobiotecnología, IPADS (INTA - CONICET), Balcarce, Argentina.
Sergio E FeingoldLaboratorio de Agrobiotecnología, IPADS (INTA - CONICET), Balcarce, Argentina.
Horacio E HoppInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular, UEDD INTA-CONICET, Hurlingham, Argentina.
Cecilia Vazquez RovereInstituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular, UEDD INTA-CONICET, Hurlingham, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational University of Mar del Plata · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potato (

Indexed as

Agrobacteriumbiotechnologygenetic engineeringgenome editingNew Breeding Techniquespotato

Identifiers

PMID35082806
PMCPMC8784693
OpenAlexW4206311827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.