ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2021
Differences of Enzymatic Activity During Composting and Vermicomposting of Sewage Sludge Mixed With Straw Pellets.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial and Metabolomic Insights into Lactic Acid Bacteria Co-Inoculation for Dough-Stage Triticale Fermentation.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Physicochemical, microbial, and microbiome dynamics in winery waste composting.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025Article
- The future in the litter bin - bioconversion of food waste as driver of a circular bioeconomy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
- Response of Carrot (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Response of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Related Microorganisms to Arsenic during Vermicomposting of Cow Dung.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Inhibitory Effects of the Addition of KNOBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aims were focused on profiling eight hydrolytic enzymes by fluorescence method using a multifunctional modular reader and studying the proportion of basic microorganism groups during composting and vermicomposting of sewage sludge mixed with straw pellets in several proportions (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%). The greatest decrease in enzymatic activity occurred in the first half of composting and vermicomposting. After 4 months of these processes, the least enzymatic activity was observed in the sludge with 50% and also 25% straw addition, indicating that straw is an important means for the rapid production of mature compost from sewage sludge. Enzymatic activity was usually less in the presence of earthworms than in the control treatment because some processes took place in the digestive tract of the earthworm. For the same reason, we observed reduced enzyme activity during fresh feedstock vermicomposting than precomposted material. The final vermicompost from fresh feedstocks exhibited less microbial biomass, and few fungi and G- bacteria compared to precomposted feedstock. The enzymatic activity during composting and vermicomposting of sewage sludge and their mixtures stabilized at the following values: β-D-glucosidase-50 μmol MUFG/h/g dw, acid phosphatase-200 μmol MUFP/h/g dw, arylsulphatase-10 μmol MUFS/h/g dw, lipase-1,000 μmol MUFY/h/g dw, chitinase-50 μmol MUFN/h/g dw, cellobiohydrolase-20 μmol MUFC/h/g dw, alanine aminopeptidase-50 μmol AMCA/h/g dw, and leucine aminopeptidase-50 μmol AMCL/h/g dw. At these and lesser values, these final products can be considered mature and stable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.