Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35082513›Full record

ArticleJournal of inflammation research2022

Establishment and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Scoring System-RAAS (RDW, AGE, APACHE II, SOFA) for Sepsis by a Retrospective Analysis.

Yingying Huang, Shaowei Jiang, Wenjie Li, Yiwen Fan, Yuxin Leng, Chengjin Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yingying Huang *Emergency Department, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shaowei Jiang *Emergency Department, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wenjie LiEmergency Department, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yiwen FanDepartment of Pathology Medicine Biology, The University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Yuxin LengCritical Care Medicine Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chengjin GaoEmergency Department, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6867-8024
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNPeking University · CNUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA modified scoring system based on the RDW, AGE, SOFA, and APACHE II score (RAAS score) was composed to investigated the short-, medium-, and long-term high risk of mortality in patients with sepsis identified early in the emergency department (ED).

methodsData were collected from a total of 1066 sepsis patients in emergency department, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from March 2013 to April 2021, including 529 patients in the primary cohort and 537 patients in the validation cohort. By comparing each parameter and the area under ROC (AUC) and K-M (Kaplan-Meier) survival curve in different periods, valuable parameters were screened out to form a new scoring system, and finally the prediction model of the nomogram was built.

resultsThe RAAS scoring system, consisting of RDW, AGE, SOFA and APACHE II, is a 0-6 scale to reflect the severity of sepsis. AUC at 30, 60, and 90 days was 0.816, 0.815, and 0.820, respectively. K-M curves across six prognostic time periods in both databases showed survival probabilities with different RDW segments and RAAS scores. In the calibration curve, the results of the internal validation of the primary cohort and the results of the external validation cohort showed the prognostic accuracy of RAAS.

conclusionThe RAAS score system is a novel and reliable indicator to predict the short-term and medium-term mortality of patients with sepsis. With the increase of the RAAS score, the mortality of patients with sepsis gradually increases.

Indexed as

mortalitynomogramsprognosisrisk factorssepsis

Identifiers

PMID35082513
PMCPMC8786358
OpenAlexW4206721765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.