ArticleNeurocomputing2021
Automatic Whole Slide Pathology Image Diagnosis Framework via Unit Stochastic Selection and Attention Fusion.
Article in Neurocomputing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational pathology: A survey review and the way forward.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Review
- AI in Cytopathology: A Narrative Umbrella Review on Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Pathomic Features Reveal Immune and Molecular Evolution From Lung Preneoplasia to Invasive Adenocarcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2023Article
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Progression Diagnosis with Intrinsic Cellular Patterns via Unsupervised Clustering.Cancers · 2022Article
- CellSpatialGraph: Integrate hierarchical phenotyping and graph modeling to characterize spatial architecture in tumor microenvironment on digital pathology.Software impacts · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pathology tissue slides are taken as the gold standard for the diagnosis of most cancer diseases. Automatic pathology slide diagnosis is still a challenging task for researchers because of the high-resolution, significant morphological variation, and ambiguity between malignant and benign regions in whole slide images (WSIs). In this study, we introduce a general framework to automatically diagnose different types of WSIs via unit stochastic selection and attention fusion. For example, a unit can denote a patch in a histopathology slide or a cell in a cytopathology slide. To be specific, we first train a unit-level convolutional neural network (CNN) to perform two tasks: constructing feature extractors for the units and for estimating a unit's non-benign probability. Then we use our novel stochastic selection algorithm to choose a small subset of units that are most likely to be non-benign, referred to as the Units Of Interest (UOI), as determined by the CNN. Next, we use the attention mechanism to fuse the representations of the UOI to form a fixed-length descriptor for the WSI's diagnosis. We evaluate the proposed framework on three datasets: histological thyroid frozen sections, histological colonoscopy tissue slides, and cytological cervical pap smear slides. The framework achieves diagnosis accuracies higher than 0.8 and AUC values higher than 0.85 in all three applications. Experiments demonstrate the generality and effectiveness of the proposed framework and its potentiality for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.