Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35082422›Full record

ArticleNature2022

Deep physical neural networks trained with backpropagation.

Logan G Wright, Tatsuhiro Onodera, Martin M Stein, Tianyu Wang, Darren T Schachter, Zoey Hu, Peter L McMahon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. All-optical computing towards 100-GHz clock rates.Light, science & applications · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Metrics for spin-based computing.Nature reviews. Physics · 2026
    Article
  20. High-clockrate free-space optical in-memory computing.Light, science & applications · 2026
    Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Logan G Wright *School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. lgw32@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7696-1260
Tatsuhiro Onodera *School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. to232@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6912-6504
Martin M SteinSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Tianyu WangSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6087-6376
Darren T SchachterSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Zoey HuSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Peter L McMahonSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. pmcmahon@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1177-9887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep-learning models have become pervasive tools in science and engineering. However, their energy requirements now increasingly limit their scalability

Identifiers

PMID35082422
PMCPMC8791835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.