Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35082413›Full record

ArticleNature2022

Emphasizing declining populations in the Living Planet Report.

Gopal Murali, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Caetano, Goni Barki, Shai Meiri, Uri Roll

Abstract readLetterComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reply to Santini et al.: Total population reports are necessary for global biomass estimation of wild mammals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Drivers of the changing abundance of European birds at two spatial scales.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Looking back on biodiversity change: lessons for the road ahead.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gopal Murali *Jacob Blaustein Center for Scientific Cooperation, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel.
Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Caetano *Jacob Blaustein Center for Scientific Cooperation, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel.
Goni Barki *Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel.
Shai MeiriSchool of Zoology & The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3839-6330
Uri RollMitrani Department of Desert Ecology, The Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel. uriroll@bgu.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-1164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesPlanets

Identifiers

PMID35082413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.